Technology has changed retail banking for ever. So much so that some computer software professionals in California’s Silicon Valley have started describing banking as merely a database of stored customer values over time.
In their view, banks are software companies and their customers are account numbers that can be serviced after studying the customers’ past transaction histories that apparently reveal their financial tastes and needs.
It is true that the introduction of computers, the neighborhood ATMs, the proliferation of mobile phone banking in the developing world and the growth of Internet banking among the urban middle class have thrown up reams of transaction data, making the study of earning and spending patterns of some sections of consumers easier.
These technologies have also helped expand the reach of banks, reduced their operational costs and enhanced the overall speed and efficiency of financial transactions.
But are the customers satisfied? A somewhat surprising revelation for the banking industry came from a survey conducted in the UK in 2000. The Cruickshank Review came up with an indubitable verdict — bank customers are not happy with the services they get.
The British are not alone in their views about their banks. Surveys conducted worldwide have reached similar conclusions. The soul-searching that followed among the banks has led to an inexorable conclusion — banks must bring back the needs and demands of customers back into their business of consumer banking.
That is especially so if a bank wants to differentiate itself from its competitors who all offer the same technical gadgetry to make transactions faster, simpler, reliable and more convenient. Therein lies the key challenge in bringing about further innovations into retail consumer banking.
THE DRAWING BOARD
Banks are now going back to their drawing boards and trying to put the customer at the center stage of their business models.
In the old setup, customers were pushed to the periphery as banks supplanted personal interaction by technological solutions to cut costs. Technological tools were seen as alternative channels to service the customer.
In the new era, banks see technology as complementary, instead of as an alternative, to face-to-face interaction. They realize that there is a direct trade-off between personal engagement and transaction convenience. As a result human contact has once again become paramount and relationship-building the cornerstone of retail banking.
It is true that maintaining personal contacts is an expensive proposition for banks, especially in retail markets in developing countries where individual asset sizes and the returns per customer are low.
Banks should turn this apparent disadvantage into an opportunity. They could use technology to facilitate human connection, rather than replace it. Under the new arrangement, a customer would be able to press a button on a mobile phone and a personal banker on the other side of the line would know all the details about the customer’s profile and be in a position to service her requirements.
Social and cultural traits of each market are going to play a critical role as banks try to understand the needs of their diverse customers. Many in Asia and other developing markets, for instance, still want to visit their branch to conduct banking transactions with a teller, rather than withdraw or deposit money from a “hole in the wall” or conduct business through the Internet.
They also have a preference for holding deposits, instead of investment products such as stocks, bonds and insurance products. Many value empathy and human connection even as they seek greater convenience in managing their financial affairs through the use of mobile phones, the Internet, credit, debit and smart cards.
Moreover, banks will have to fine-tune their financial offerings to suit our changing lifestyles. People are living longer and staying healthier longer. Extended families are giving way to nuclear families and in many cases single-parent households. This means people’s demands for financial products and services are changing faster than ever before.
LEARNING FROM THE WEB
Social Web-based communities such as Facebook, MySpace and LinkedIn that have evolved in recent years using the Web 2.0 computer software model have a lot to teach retail bankers as the world changes around us. Banks have an opportunity stand out from the crowd by leveraging such innovations to get to the minds, and wallets, of their customers.
These free, user friendly and easily accessible social communities often have a better grasp of consumer trends and the needs and aspirations of the average customer. Some such as Zopa.com are already acting as mediators between individual lenders and borrowers mainly for disbursing personal and unsecured loans.
Could these virtual communities emerge as a challenge to the banks? What, apart from regulatory restrictions, prevents these communities from becoming fully-fledged channels for financial transactions between consenting parties?
Clearly, there is a case for banks to consider whether they can partner or internalize such Web communities into their business models.
Internet-based models are not an option in several developing countries where the reach of the broadband network is limited. Moreover, many customers who have access to the Internet are reluctant to conduct financial transactions either because of security concerns or because they find the user interface daunting.
Banks in Kenya have got around the problem of the limited reach of the Iinternet by offering SMS banking through mobile phones to customers. The model has become so successful that it is now being rolled out across South Asia where banks face similar challenges about reaching the hitherto inaccessible customers in small towns and villages.
This is a trend that we will see carrying through in the coming years. Banks will take the best of breed in terms of customer experience in one market and implement it in others.
The quality of mobile phone handsets and the non-standardization of software and communications protocol are some of the issues, which are holding back a more rapid implementation of this technology in banking.
Many see the launch of Android, the open software for mobile phones developed by Google Inc, as a breakthrough in standardizing mobile phone banking technology.
THE FUTURE
The future, especially in the developing world, lies in leveraging the mobile phone and enablers of point-of-sale transactions. More so for the “Right Here, Right Now” generation who want to conduct transactions while commuting on a train or standing in a queue, confident that their transactions will be secure.
Standard Chartered, for instance, is developing prototypes of new service models and, following regulatory approvals, quickly releasing them in the markets, instead of waiting for years to come up with a foolproof model before rolling it out to customers.
Following the release of a new model, the bank aims to constantly upgrade the product based on client feedback, which is likely to be instant in the new era.
The challenge will lie in crunching the entire prototype-to-markets cycle to a few months, rather than years, so that customers can use the latest in banking technology and the pioneering bank can make the most of its investments in developing that technology. The duration of the cycle will, of course, depend on the speed of regulatory approvals granted in each market.
Clearly, a lot can be done to push the frontiers in retail banking technology. But the future will lie in providing customers with a fast, easily accessible, reliable, and yet, personalized user experience every time they want to manage their financial affairs.
Although banking technology has advanced, there is an increasing need for financial advisers to help customers sift through innumerable complex choices to make financial decisions. The ultimate goal of a retail banker would be to anticipate the needs of every client by putting himself in his customers’ shoes.
It is a tall order but one that will determine the winner in 21st century consumer banking.
Andy Hon is the managing director of consumer banking at Standard Chartered Bank (Taiwan).
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS