President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) won the support of voters by campaigning on the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) vast pool of economic experts, their years of experience and two slogans: “We’re ready and “6-3-3” — 6 percent economic growth, a 3 percent unemployment rate and a per capita income of US$30,000. However, voters have now discovered that the KMT government cannot offer a new Eden and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) has been forced to admit that there is in fact no economic panacea and that it will take time for the economy to improve.
The government’s honeymoon has been cut short and it is facing a chorus of complaints because it underestimated the deterioration of the global economy while overestimating its own capabilities. The result was a series of unattainable goals: The 6-3-3 policy might have just been possible if times were good, but it is naive at a time when economic experts are worried by domestic and international stagflation. Growth-promoting measures will add to inflationary pressures, while anti-inflationary measures are likely to offset economic growth measures. The government’s view of this dilemma is too simplistic.
Another miscalculation was an inability to make the right priorities. When the new administration took over on May 20, prices were an urgent concern. The three-pronged impact of rising global prices for oil, commodities and food caused prices in Taiwan to shoot up. The government’s response was to say it was helpless against imported inflation and it raised domestic oil prices, thereby adding to inflationary pressures. As prices rise across the board, the public has begun to lose confidence in the government.
The third miscalculation was placing so much emphasis on the Chinese market, hoping that opening up Taiwan to Chinese tourism and deregulating Chinese investments would boost Taiwan’s economy at a time when China also is suffering from a slumping stock market, high inflation and slowing economic growth.
Although the government has introduced policies to expand internal demand and government investment, these policies were made in haste. As history has shown, the result will be massive waste as the central and local governments look for any excuse to spend money. One can only wonder how much this will actually stimulate the economy.
A month into their terms, Ma and Liu have been forced to admit to the public and stock market investors, who have lost an average of NT$530,000, that it will be quite some time before the economy turns around. Perhaps it is some kind of progress that the government is now willing to face reality and stop lying to the public.
In order to solve a problem, one must define it. At present, the primary goal should be to curb inflation. Since the central bank has announced that it is tightening monetary policy to ease inflationary pressures, the Ministry of Economic Affairs should consider whether it is wise to raise fuel prices again tomorrow to avoid policy conflicts between the central bank and the ministry. The end result of trying to make everything perfect may be that nothing works out in the end.
After the Cabinet announced eight measures to boost the stock market, the Presidential Office held a meeting to discuss the economic situation yesterday evening, leaving us with the impression that Ma and Liu are working along different lines to deal with the economy. However, a correct understanding of the causes of the current problems is more important than offering a few quick fixes.
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
RSS