President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) won the support of voters by campaigning on the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) vast pool of economic experts, their years of experience and two slogans: “We’re ready and “6-3-3” — 6 percent economic growth, a 3 percent unemployment rate and a per capita income of US$30,000. However, voters have now discovered that the KMT government cannot offer a new Eden and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) has been forced to admit that there is in fact no economic panacea and that it will take time for the economy to improve.
The government’s honeymoon has been cut short and it is facing a chorus of complaints because it underestimated the deterioration of the global economy while overestimating its own capabilities. The result was a series of unattainable goals: The 6-3-3 policy might have just been possible if times were good, but it is naive at a time when economic experts are worried by domestic and international stagflation. Growth-promoting measures will add to inflationary pressures, while anti-inflationary measures are likely to offset economic growth measures. The government’s view of this dilemma is too simplistic.
Another miscalculation was an inability to make the right priorities. When the new administration took over on May 20, prices were an urgent concern. The three-pronged impact of rising global prices for oil, commodities and food caused prices in Taiwan to shoot up. The government’s response was to say it was helpless against imported inflation and it raised domestic oil prices, thereby adding to inflationary pressures. As prices rise across the board, the public has begun to lose confidence in the government.
The third miscalculation was placing so much emphasis on the Chinese market, hoping that opening up Taiwan to Chinese tourism and deregulating Chinese investments would boost Taiwan’s economy at a time when China also is suffering from a slumping stock market, high inflation and slowing economic growth.
Although the government has introduced policies to expand internal demand and government investment, these policies were made in haste. As history has shown, the result will be massive waste as the central and local governments look for any excuse to spend money. One can only wonder how much this will actually stimulate the economy.
A month into their terms, Ma and Liu have been forced to admit to the public and stock market investors, who have lost an average of NT$530,000, that it will be quite some time before the economy turns around. Perhaps it is some kind of progress that the government is now willing to face reality and stop lying to the public.
In order to solve a problem, one must define it. At present, the primary goal should be to curb inflation. Since the central bank has announced that it is tightening monetary policy to ease inflationary pressures, the Ministry of Economic Affairs should consider whether it is wise to raise fuel prices again tomorrow to avoid policy conflicts between the central bank and the ministry. The end result of trying to make everything perfect may be that nothing works out in the end.
After the Cabinet announced eight measures to boost the stock market, the Presidential Office held a meeting to discuss the economic situation yesterday evening, leaving us with the impression that Ma and Liu are working along different lines to deal with the economy. However, a correct understanding of the causes of the current problems is more important than offering a few quick fixes.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
RSS