Joint gas field development by China and Japan is unlikely to slake the energy thirst of Asia's two largest economies but could lead to wider cooperation over vital resources, analysts said on Wednesday.
Japan and China agreed on Wednesday to jointly develop one of several disputed gas field in the East China Sea, following a long-standing row between the Asian powers over lucrative drilling rights for natural gas.
“The accord is likely to lead to further cooperation between the two countries in the field of energy, which is crucial for both of them,” said Kensuke Kanekiyo, an expert at the Institute of Energy Economics in Tokyo.
However, the deal is seen as only a small step in the right direction.
“The deal would be significant politically, but it is unlikely to improve the two countries’ energy situations dramatically,” said Hirofumi Kawachi, a senior analyst at Mizuho Investors Securities.
The two Asian giants guzzle massive amounts of energy.
Japan has almost no natural energy resources of its own and buys more than 90 percent of its oil from the Middle East. China also relies heavily on energy imports to fuel its double-digit economic growth.
The two countries are also competing to secure oil supplies from Russia’s Far East while cooperating in areas such as energy saving technology.
“For Japan, [the gas deal] is part of the country’s long-term efforts to reduce its heavy reliance on oil imports from the Middle East,” said Yoshihisa Miyamoto, an analyst at Okasan Securities.
“For China, securing stable energy supplies is a pressing need to sustain its booming economy,” Miyamoto said, describing the accord as “a practical compromise.”
Analysts said soaring crude oil prices made the development of the gas fields an even more attractive proposition.
Japanese companies will participate in the existing Chinese development of the Chunxiao gas field, which Japan calls Shirakaba, Tokyo said on Wednesday.
Chunxiao is located just west of the Japanese-proposed median line. Tokyo has previously voiced concern that China may siphon gas from its own side of the line.
The field has explorable reserves of 63.8 million barrels of oil equivalent, while the whole of the East China Sea could yield up to 3.26 billion barrels, according to data from the Japanese and Chinese governments.
The two countries are also set to jointly develop the Longjing field, or Asunaro in Japanese — the northernmost of four gas fields near the median line, media reports said.
Japan consumed 97 billion cubic meters of gas in 2006, or 610 million barrels of oil equivalent, almost all of which was imported, the International Energy Agency said.
Han Xuegong (韓學�?an independent oil analyst in Beijing, said there should be no technical obstacles to the gas field development.
“Economically it depends on the oil price,” he said, adding that given current market conditions the project should be worth the required investment.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under