Rising fuel prices are causing global concern and some panic. Taiwan’s new government is going to get serious about energy savings and carbon-emission reductions with officials in the Presidential Office setting an example by swapping their big limos for smaller cars. The Cabinet is going to follow suit.
But driving smaller cars is only a small step. The government should review its mechanism for replacing officials’ cars so that future purchases will be based on environmental standards and real needs. Not to do so would be a complete waste of taxpayers’ money.
The legislature’s Budgetary Research Center has repeatedly suggested that the heads of government institutions set a good example by making low carbon emissions their priority when purchasing new cars. However, this suggestion has largely fallen on deaf ears and legislative officials have not been good role models.
For example, when former deputy speaker Tseng Yung-chuan (曾永權) took office, he was provided with an official car with a 4.6 liter engine. Amid strong public criticism, he exchanged it for a smaller car. The government considered selling Tseng’s first car, but decided against it because it would lose NT$1 million on the deal. In the end, the car was left in a garage. What a waste of money.
But trading down is not a solution. Complementary measures for cars powered by alternative fuels would make energy-saving policies even more effective. Although people know that altering their cars to use natural gas rather than gasoline will save them money, only a few are willing to do so because government subsidies are insufficient and the gasoline companies are unwilling to invest in natural gas filling stations.
Hybrid cars that use gas and electricity, or solar-powered cars, have yet to become common because solar batteries are expensive and aren’t efficient enough. Soaring oil prices, however, are providing a new incentive for developing economically efficient solar or hydrogen-powered cars. The government should offer tax incentives or subsidies to encourage industry or academic institutions to develop alternative energy sources for vehicles.
Biofuels are not the answer and neither are subsidies that encourage farmers to shift production to fuel crops. This has only helped boost agricultural prices, created inflationary pressures and hurt economically disadvantaged groups. Unless there are guaranties that food prices won’t increase, promoting biofuels will only create other problems.
However, in addition to government officials setting an example to encourage the public to start using public transportation, save energy and cut down on carbon emissions, real energy savings and carbon emission reductions also require the promotion of bicycles, which would have the added benefit of improving public health. To do so, however, the government must develop a convenient network of bicycle paths to avoid traffic chaos and improve safety.
In this regard, Yeh Chin-chuan (葉金川), deputy secretary-general of the Presidential Office, is setting a good example by riding his bicycle to work every morning.
The alarm bells are going off around the world on global warming and the energy crisis. People and national leaders in many countries are now promoting energy saving and carbon emission reductions. Taiwan must follow suit and the government should take the lead.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS