Zhou Yao, aged about six, beams at the camera as she poses in a garden. Then she is a confident nine-year-old, hands on hips, head cocked.
At 14, she is deliberately pensive, with the self-consciousness of a girl who knows she will soon become a woman.
That photograph is the last one in her mother’s pile. There will be no more.
Yao’s casket of ashes now stands in her parents’ home in Dujiangyan. They found her body hours after the Juyuan Middle School collapsed in the earthquake on Monday last week.
Like families across Sichuan Province, her parents are angry and disbelieving.
Almost 7,000 classrooms across the quake zone were destroyed, the government has acknowledged.
Thousands of children were entombed as they studied. Hundreds of children are believed to have died in Juyuan and at another school across town.
Similar numbers were trapped in the wreckage of seven schools in Mianzhu, the middle school at Beichuan and a high school in Shifang County. The toll is staggering, even in a province that has seen so much death.
In Beichuan, the whole town was devastated; only a handful of single-story buildings seem to have survived. But in Dujiangyan, the distress of parents is magnified by the fact that most buildings — even those directly next to the collapsed schools — still stand.
Passions have become so inflamed that the government has pledged to investigate claims of shoddy construction, possibly linked to corruption, and to severely punish those responsible. It has even fielded the questions of grieving parents online, a remarkable act of openness.
“The tragedy has happened and I have to face up to it. We just want justice,” said Yao’s mother, Wang Fengying, her reddened face smeared with tears.
Amid exercise books and school textbooks, she pulled out a certificate of merit for excelling in exams. Competition for entry at Juyuan was fierce and Yao had to fight her way in.
“Chinese, math and English — she got good marks in all of them,” her mother said. “The school gave them a very good education. But the quality of the buildings was very bad.”
Stacking up the schoolbooks again in a basket, she slumped with grief.
“I have a strong character, but when I see these I feel crushed. I want to burn them but I can’t make up my mind to do it,” she said. “I could overcome any difficulties, but not this one.”
Yao’s brother flicked through the pages of a schoolbook listlessly; he helped to dig his little sister out of the rubble. The family is convulsed with grief, her grandmother choking on sobs. Even the infant son of a watching neighbor is solemn.
“All the innocent lives were taken by this big disaster. We want an explanation from the school,” Wang said. “Children are the future of the nation. But the school didn’t treasure them. The teacher came here, but the officials haven’t even sent their condolences.”
Parents with no history of challenging authority are determined that someone must account for their loss.
Just up the road at the town’s crematorium, a mother sitting by the ashes of her 11-year-old daughter showed us mobile phone images of the wreckage from Xinjian Elementary School. She did not want to give her name, but was eager to talk.
“All the parents are angry. Look, there’s no steel in the concrete. We want to fight for justice together, that’s why we took these pictures,” she said. “We’ve been collecting evidence and taking samples. The debris was basically sand — not even pieces of concrete.”
She alleged that experts had warned local officials three years ago that both the destroyed schools were poorly constructed and potentially dangerous — a claim that is impossible to verify and that may simply reflect the speed with which rumors rattle around this angry community. What is certain is that concern about the collapse of so many schools has resonated far beyond the bereaved.
“We cannot afford not to raise uneasy questions about the structural quality of school buildings,” the English-language China Daily noted shortly after the quake.
The columnist Zhang Jinghua (張京華) was more pointed in the Economic Observer.
“We saw elegant government buildings remain intact while dozens of schools crumbled like houses of sand,” he wrote.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with