Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) is widely regarded as a good communicator; an eloquent speaker whose choice of words and speaking style the public can relate to.
Wu’s communication skills are undoubtedly one of the main reasons why President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) chose him to succeed Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄), a stuffy academic who struggled in this regard.
Wu’s talents were certainly on full display over the weekend at an environmental award ceremony when he told the audience that five of the nation’s biggest companies — Taipower; CPC Corp, Taiwan; China Steel; China Shipbuilding and Formosa Petrochemicals — should ramp up efforts to cut carbon emissions.
The premier certainly chose his targets wisely as together the five companies are responsible for a large portion of the nation’s total emissions and the reason that it has one of the highest per capita emissions ratios in the world.
One simple, important fact that seemed to escape Wu though was that four of the five companies he singled out are state-owned, the exception being Formosa Petrochemicals.
This means that the government holds a controlling stake in these companies, and if Wu and his administration wanted to make a difference, they could do so easily.
For example, if Wu really is serious about promoting renewable energy, he could force Taipower to increase the tariffs it pays for wind and other renewable energy sources — a key sticking point for foreign investors in the market.
In the case of CPC Corp, Taiwan, Wu could order an increase in gas prices in a bid to encourage use of public transport. He could also make the firm install electric chargers and LPG facilities at gas stations nationwide to encourage people to buy the energy efficient gas and battery-powered vehicles that are beginning to roll off automobile production lines around the world.
China Steel and China Shipbuilding, meanwhile, could be made to invest in energy efficient machinery, equipment and practices.
If the government is really serious about cutting industrial emissions, they could also introduce a carbon tax or carbon trading — two effective measures it has been vacillating on for a number of years.
Wu also mentioned that the Presidential Office has joined the environmental effort by turning off lights in the daytime, using water-efficient faucets and raising the thermostats on its air-conditioners, but trying to encourage such frugality is pointless when state-run utilities continue to sell water and electricity at ridiculously low prices. It is even more pointless when there is almost no effort being made to promote environmentally friendly behavior to the public.
Instead, the government is spending most of its time promoting an economic cooperation framework agreement with China, an agreement that is predicted to benefit big companies such as Formosa and CPC, while probably increasing their emissions.
The problem for Wu is that with Taiwan’s electoral cycle, there is never a right time to enforce painful policy decisions that are capable of making the difference to the nation’s shockingly bad record on carbon emissions.
So with Wu lacking the political will to put his money where his mouth is, the only contribution to global warming we can expect from him during the rest of his tenure is a negative one — from all the hot air that he keeps spouting.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past