They do it more often than you might think. Now and again, a governor or mayor will drop out of sight for a day or three, whether for quiet rest and relation, political work or to visit a significant other. And some do it so often that the public and the press have come to take it for granted.
When he first took office in 2002, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg repeatedly refused to tell reporters where he was on weekends. (On at least one occasion, Bermuda, it turned out.) The mayor’s secretiveness prompted the New York Post to print an image of a milk carton with the mayor’s picture on it.
These days, Bloomberg, who owns homes in London and Vail, Colorado, as well as Bermuda, still jets off on weekend getaways without telling the City Hall press corps where he is going, or even that he will be gone. But it is no longer news.
Ditto with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who attracted much attention when he was first elected for taking off for parts unknown. Unlike Bloomberg, however, Schwarzenegger’s office usually notifies reporters when he is out of California — even if they do not say precisely where — as they did last week with this typically terse advisory: “Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has left the state.”
Another wealthy politician, New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, has also become famous for his out-of-state jaunts, few of which are listed on his public schedule. In 2007, the New York Times became aware of Corzine’s frequent absences only after someone close to the State Senate president, the man in charge while the governor is away, casually mentioned that he would be acting governor, again, that weekend.
What Messrs. Corzine, Schwarzenegger and Bloomberg do on their many private trips usually remain closely guarded secrets. But their aides point out that they stay in close touch via BlackBerrys and cellphones and take appropriate steps to ensure that power is transferred to a second in command when they leave town. It appears little of that happened with South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford when he disappeared last weekend.
Laws concerning succession of power when governors leave their states or mayors leave their cities vary from place to place. There are certainly no standard rules when it comes to notifying reporters when a governor or mayor is on the road, officials and experts say.
In Connecticut, Governor M. Jodi Rell is required to send a letter when she leaves the state notifying the lieutenant governor that he shall “exercise the powers and authority and perform the duties appertaining to the office of governor” until she returns. A spokesman for Rell, Adam Liegeot, said that as a general practice, members of the local news media are informed whenever she leaves the state, even if it is to visit New York.
Not so in Florida, where Governor Charlie Crist is not required to turn over power when he leaves the state. Erin Isaac, communications director for Crist, said her office does not notify the news media when the governor travels on political or personal business.
“But if people ask, we tell them,” Isaac said.
At least one governor, Tim Kaine of Virginia, took Sanford to task for his disappearance. Kaine, who is chairman of the Democratic National Committee, criticized Sanford, a Republican, for traveling without his security detail and being out of touch for several days.
“Everybody always knows where I am,” Kaine said on Thursday on his monthly radio show on WRVA in Richmond. “I always have security with me and the reason they’re there isn’t necessarily to protect me from a bear. They’re there mostly if I have to make a decision so they can hand me a satphone and I can make a decision.”
Still, the governor’s office does not always notify the press corps when Kaine leaves the state on political or personal business, which happens several times a month, said Lynda Tran, his communications director.
Aides to several governors said that given technology today, it is extremely rare for a governor to be out of touch. And given the multiplicity of news outlets today, from newspapers to cable TV networks to blogs, it is difficult for a governor, much less a mayor, to escape from view for very long.
When Washington Governor Chris Gregoire canceled a speech this year and her office refused to say where she was, the Olympia press corps was abuzz with rumors for a full day. She was, it turned out, visiting troops in Iraq.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath