US President Barack Obama’s dramatic intervention into the fate of the US’ big three carmakers has sent a signal to the global auto sector to get its act together or drown.
The ouster of Rick Wagoner and Christian Streiff as chief executives of General Motors (GM) and Peugeot Citroen on Monday sent tremors through the boardrooms of the battered auto industry.
Lacking the systemic importance of the banking sector, which has been bailed out with trillions of dollars, the car industry is being left to bleed to death — or consolidate.
This month, Martin Winterkorn, chief executive of Volkswagen — the world’s third-largest car maker and sure-fire survivor of the financial crisis — told 200 analysts and reporters he could see the survival of one Japanese firm, perhaps a few Chinese, two or three Europeans and an American — Ford, clearly.
Even Toyota, the most likely Japanese survivor, which is run by a close-knit team of visionary engineers dedicated to eco-friendly technological innovation, is in trouble as the industry’s expectations for global sales of 70 million have turned into, at best, 50 million this year. US sales alone could halve to little more than 8.5 million.
In Europe sales could fall by between 20 percent and 30 percent and are now held up in a dozen countries by “scrappage” — payments for scrapping older cars. The 780 billion euro (US$1.04 trillion) European car industry suffers from at least 20 percent overcapacity and structural problems pre-dating the crisis.
The industry will see a shake-out in the coming year that could mean only a handful of firms remain in business. Volswagen, which is virtually in Porsche’s hands, will be one of them. French President Nicolas Sarkozy will do his damnedest to ensure that at least Renault — part-owner of Nissan and itself 30 percent state-owned — survives.
Daimler, owner of Mercedes, and BMW may be forced into a premium merger. Even in an Obama-backed shotgun marriage with Chrysler, Italy’s Fiat may bite the dust.
In Asia, China’s 150 auto firms will be forced by Beijing into a series of mergers and acquisitions. India’s Tata will — if it survives its expensive Jaguar Land Rover takeover — dominate the landscape, and in South Korea Kia is likely to emerge as the big player, with Hyundai — linked to GM — on a funeral pyre.
Wagoner was fired by Obama because he had failed to lay the ground for the “green” revolution and had driven what was the world’s biggest carmaker for 80 years into a brick wall as it ran out of cash. Insiders say that, with more genuine independent directors on his board, he would have gone years ago.
His departure underlines that Obama meant what he said during his presidential campaign when he warned the industry it should be on a sustainable path in an era of “peak oil” and the need for fuel-efficiency. The global industry, with a few exceptions, ignored his message. Top carmakers have been lobbying the EU for years to get Brussels to water down its environmental plans to cut car emissions levels.
But other car bosses could now be vulnerable as the industry looks for new leadership to reflect the changed agenda. Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche and BMW head CEO Norbert Reithofer could be next in the firing line as premium carmakers suffer disproportionately from the global collapse of sales.
At Daimler, Zetsche, the walrus-mustached former head of Chrysler during a disastrous 10-year marriage, is struggling to contain a plunge in Mercedes sales after a profit warning, amid speculation it might be forced to merge with BMW, its bitter rival.
BMW’s Reithofer has so far retained the support of the Quandt family, who owns 46 percent of the firm. But the family, which rescued a near-bankrupt BMW 50 years ago, is expanding its interests elsewhere. Reithofer is also surrounded by a new, more youthful board, including sales chief, Ian Robertson.
Carl-Peter Forster, president of GM Europe and a former BMW director, may also feel the heat as a US$3.3 billion rescue plan for Opel, Vauxhall and Saab falters in the wake of the White House’s rejection of Wagoner’s restructuring program. At most, it buys German Chancellor Angela Merkel more time to sort out the threat to a quarter of a million jobs before the Sept. 29 general election.
Streiff, victim of a boardroom coup, was not even thanked for his stint as Peugeot chief in a curt statement from chairman Thierry Peugeot, who is appointing Corus boss, Philippe Varin, to succeed him.
Varin, former head of aluminium group Pechiney, is highly regarded after turning around Anglo-Dutch Corus, integrating British Steel and Hoogovens and presiding over the sale to India’s Tata group. Streiff, the former deputy chief executive of glassmaker St Gobain and who reportedly suffered a mini-stroke last year, made enemies in the boardroom and lost its confidence — including crucially that of the controlling Peugeot family — with his abrasive style, sole focus on cost-cutting that shed 11,000 jobs and lack of strategic vision, including for mergers.
He had previously lasted just 100 days as head of Airbus as his drive to cut costs and lack of diplomatic skills alienated the key Franco-German players, including both governments, at the planemaker’s owner, EADS.
There will be upheavals not only in boardrooms as the tarnished old guard makes way for the “green new deal” protagonists of electric cars, but in the industry as a whole.
Obama has ensured this with the stroke of a pen — and an unprecedentedly blunt intervention.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers