One of the greatest challenges facing the country is how to cope with outbreaks of disease and protect public health.
The SARS epidemic in 2003 highlighted the need for a sound outbreak prevention system, the means for rapid analyzing outbreaks, ready emergency responses, transparency in information on outbreaks and proper public health education.
Dengue fever broke out for the first time in Kaohsiung, Pingtung and Tainan after the government opened the country to tourism in 1987.
In recent years, the scale of the disease has extended and the number of dengue hemorrhagic fever cases has increased, a warning that serious challenges will come in the wake of global warming.
Moreover, the early outbreak of critical cases of enteroviral infections this year has shown that there is still room for improvement in the integration of an outbreak prevention system and epidemiological research.
As cross-strait direct charter flights, which are scheduled to start in July, will greatly increase the number of people entering the country every day, we may wonder whether the nation’s disease prevention systems are sufficiently prepared for impending challenges.
There are several actions the government should take to protect the public.
First, a flexible, pragmatic and time-efficient epidemic prevention system should be developed.
After the SARS epidemic and terrorist attacks using anthrax in the US, depending solely on passive reporting by hospitals is not enough to provide correct and effective emergency responses. It is necessary to upgrade the system to one in which a public health unit actively reports information on outbreaks, including integration of the acute disease syndromes prevention system with microbiology experiments or examination and surveillance of drug sales. Most importantly, the government must keep up with the latest trends in advanced countries.
Second, it should promote open, impartial and transparent policies of outbreak prevention, research and emergency responses through interdisciplinary cooperation.
Taiwan’s past epidemic prevention policies were mostly centralized.
When an outbreak began to spread or the central government made a wrong decision, it usually failed to address the situation and the bottom-up emergency response capability was lost as well.
It is necessary that government officials avoid conflicts of interest and that amateur personnel not end up leading professional personnel.
Third, the country should join and help build international systems for cooperative outbreak prevention.
Although Taiwan has long been excluded from access to the epidemic prevention systems of the WHO because of political reasons, when faced with a drastic increase of new outbreaks, the incoming government should actively participate in Asia-Pacific regional outbreak prevention systems.
Taiwan should provide outbreak surveillance techniques and support in international information exchange, taking a position as a joint epidemic prevention center with surrounding countries in order to fulfill its obligations and responsibilities to promote international health.
King Chwan-chuen is a professor at the Institute of Epidemiology in the College of Public Health at National Taiwan University. Wu Tsung-shu is a former substitute service draftee in public health for the Malawi medical mission.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with