A sudden crackdown by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe’s security apparatus has shown that he is determined to hold a second-round presidential election against opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai.
It also suggests he is about to revive rigging mechanisms used in previous elections to ensure victory, according to reports and a wide variety of sources in the diplomatic and civic community.
Mugabe met the politburo of his Zanu-PF party on Friday, reportedly to discuss going into a second round.
The talks took place amid indications that neither he nor Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Tsvangirai would win more than the 50 per cent of votes from the March 29 election needed for an outright victory.
After four days of silence from the government, shadowy intruders ransacked MDC offices, while police arrested two foreign journalists on charges of working “illegally” in Zimbabwe, along with a member of a US think-tank, the National Democratic Institute.
Sources in the northern town of Bindura also reported that members of Mugabe’s defeated ZANU-PF party’s youth militia were mobilizing, while in the nearby town of Shamva, sources reported people gathering in groups of more than five were being arrested.
In Harare, a column of about 400 men in their 20s and 30s in poor, worn clothing and rucksacks was marched through the center of town with a police escort.
“They look like war veterans,” said an onlooker, referring to the militia used by Mugabe in previous elections to terrorize opposition supporters.
Official comments could not be obtained.
Six days after the critical elections, the state Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) had still not announced the results of the presidential poll, although electoral experts say that the ballots have already been counted and collated in constituency centers nationwide.
The same experts say it should take no more than a day to pull them together into the total number of votes for each of the three candidates — Mugabe, Tsvangirai and Simba Makoni, Mugabe’s former finance minister who abandoned the ruling party in February to challenge his former mentor.
Zimbabweans had to wait through four days of drip-fed announcements before they learned that the opposition won the House of Assembly (lower house of parliament) vote with 109 seats against ZANU-PF’s 97.
Observers believe that Mugabe has ordered the ZEC to delay the results to give him time to manipulate his way out of the next challenge — the presidential vote and the likely second round runoff.
The MDC claimed on Wednesday that from its own tally of votes collected from polling stations, Tsvangirai won 50.3 percent against Mugabe’s 43.8 percent and should be declared the winner, although scrutiny of their figures shows the pro-democracy leader’s percentage was 49.1.
A rigorous random sampling by the respected local election watchdog, the Zimbabwe Election Support Network, gave Tsvangirai 49.4 percent and Mugabe 41.8 percent.
In the parliamentary election, although Tsvangirai’s MDC faction took more seats, ZANU-PF more of the total votes cast with 45.9 percent.
However, observers say that the extra votes for ZANU-PF cannot be translated into votes for Mugabe in a possible second round.
Election observers say they noted that a large number of people who voted for ZANU-PF in the parliamentary vote did not vote for Mugabe in the presidential ballot.
Heavily stacked against Mugabe are those who voted for Makoni, who formed a pact with the smaller faction of the MDC led by robotics professor Arthur Mutambara.
“The natural choice for these voters is Tsvangirai,” an official with a private election watchdog said.
The usually well-informed weekly Zimbabwe Independent reported on Friday that Mugabe was considering issuing an edict that would replace the three-week period between the first and second rounds required by the Constitution, with a three-month hiatus.
“That will give him all that time to abolish the reformed laws that made last week’s elections relatively transparent and difficult to rig and to carry out a real ZANU-PF-style election, with violent intimidation and outright rigging,” a Western diplomat said.
“It looks as if he’s already started,” the diplomat said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry