A sudden crackdown by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe’s security apparatus has shown that he is determined to hold a second-round presidential election against opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai.
It also suggests he is about to revive rigging mechanisms used in previous elections to ensure victory, according to reports and a wide variety of sources in the diplomatic and civic community.
Mugabe met the politburo of his Zanu-PF party on Friday, reportedly to discuss going into a second round.
The talks took place amid indications that neither he nor Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Tsvangirai would win more than the 50 per cent of votes from the March 29 election needed for an outright victory.
After four days of silence from the government, shadowy intruders ransacked MDC offices, while police arrested two foreign journalists on charges of working “illegally” in Zimbabwe, along with a member of a US think-tank, the National Democratic Institute.
Sources in the northern town of Bindura also reported that members of Mugabe’s defeated ZANU-PF party’s youth militia were mobilizing, while in the nearby town of Shamva, sources reported people gathering in groups of more than five were being arrested.
In Harare, a column of about 400 men in their 20s and 30s in poor, worn clothing and rucksacks was marched through the center of town with a police escort.
“They look like war veterans,” said an onlooker, referring to the militia used by Mugabe in previous elections to terrorize opposition supporters.
Official comments could not be obtained.
Six days after the critical elections, the state Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) had still not announced the results of the presidential poll, although electoral experts say that the ballots have already been counted and collated in constituency centers nationwide.
The same experts say it should take no more than a day to pull them together into the total number of votes for each of the three candidates — Mugabe, Tsvangirai and Simba Makoni, Mugabe’s former finance minister who abandoned the ruling party in February to challenge his former mentor.
Zimbabweans had to wait through four days of drip-fed announcements before they learned that the opposition won the House of Assembly (lower house of parliament) vote with 109 seats against ZANU-PF’s 97.
Observers believe that Mugabe has ordered the ZEC to delay the results to give him time to manipulate his way out of the next challenge — the presidential vote and the likely second round runoff.
The MDC claimed on Wednesday that from its own tally of votes collected from polling stations, Tsvangirai won 50.3 percent against Mugabe’s 43.8 percent and should be declared the winner, although scrutiny of their figures shows the pro-democracy leader’s percentage was 49.1.
A rigorous random sampling by the respected local election watchdog, the Zimbabwe Election Support Network, gave Tsvangirai 49.4 percent and Mugabe 41.8 percent.
In the parliamentary election, although Tsvangirai’s MDC faction took more seats, ZANU-PF more of the total votes cast with 45.9 percent.
However, observers say that the extra votes for ZANU-PF cannot be translated into votes for Mugabe in a possible second round.
Election observers say they noted that a large number of people who voted for ZANU-PF in the parliamentary vote did not vote for Mugabe in the presidential ballot.
Heavily stacked against Mugabe are those who voted for Makoni, who formed a pact with the smaller faction of the MDC led by robotics professor Arthur Mutambara.
“The natural choice for these voters is Tsvangirai,” an official with a private election watchdog said.
The usually well-informed weekly Zimbabwe Independent reported on Friday that Mugabe was considering issuing an edict that would replace the three-week period between the first and second rounds required by the Constitution, with a three-month hiatus.
“That will give him all that time to abolish the reformed laws that made last week’s elections relatively transparent and difficult to rig and to carry out a real ZANU-PF-style election, with violent intimidation and outright rigging,” a Western diplomat said.
“It looks as if he’s already started,” the diplomat said.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS