A sudden crackdown by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe’s security apparatus has shown that he is determined to hold a second-round presidential election against opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai.
It also suggests he is about to revive rigging mechanisms used in previous elections to ensure victory, according to reports and a wide variety of sources in the diplomatic and civic community.
Mugabe met the politburo of his Zanu-PF party on Friday, reportedly to discuss going into a second round.
The talks took place amid indications that neither he nor Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Tsvangirai would win more than the 50 per cent of votes from the March 29 election needed for an outright victory.
After four days of silence from the government, shadowy intruders ransacked MDC offices, while police arrested two foreign journalists on charges of working “illegally” in Zimbabwe, along with a member of a US think-tank, the National Democratic Institute.
Sources in the northern town of Bindura also reported that members of Mugabe’s defeated ZANU-PF party’s youth militia were mobilizing, while in the nearby town of Shamva, sources reported people gathering in groups of more than five were being arrested.
In Harare, a column of about 400 men in their 20s and 30s in poor, worn clothing and rucksacks was marched through the center of town with a police escort.
“They look like war veterans,” said an onlooker, referring to the militia used by Mugabe in previous elections to terrorize opposition supporters.
Official comments could not be obtained.
Six days after the critical elections, the state Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) had still not announced the results of the presidential poll, although electoral experts say that the ballots have already been counted and collated in constituency centers nationwide.
The same experts say it should take no more than a day to pull them together into the total number of votes for each of the three candidates — Mugabe, Tsvangirai and Simba Makoni, Mugabe’s former finance minister who abandoned the ruling party in February to challenge his former mentor.
Zimbabweans had to wait through four days of drip-fed announcements before they learned that the opposition won the House of Assembly (lower house of parliament) vote with 109 seats against ZANU-PF’s 97.
Observers believe that Mugabe has ordered the ZEC to delay the results to give him time to manipulate his way out of the next challenge — the presidential vote and the likely second round runoff.
The MDC claimed on Wednesday that from its own tally of votes collected from polling stations, Tsvangirai won 50.3 percent against Mugabe’s 43.8 percent and should be declared the winner, although scrutiny of their figures shows the pro-democracy leader’s percentage was 49.1.
A rigorous random sampling by the respected local election watchdog, the Zimbabwe Election Support Network, gave Tsvangirai 49.4 percent and Mugabe 41.8 percent.
In the parliamentary election, although Tsvangirai’s MDC faction took more seats, ZANU-PF more of the total votes cast with 45.9 percent.
However, observers say that the extra votes for ZANU-PF cannot be translated into votes for Mugabe in a possible second round.
Election observers say they noted that a large number of people who voted for ZANU-PF in the parliamentary vote did not vote for Mugabe in the presidential ballot.
Heavily stacked against Mugabe are those who voted for Makoni, who formed a pact with the smaller faction of the MDC led by robotics professor Arthur Mutambara.
“The natural choice for these voters is Tsvangirai,” an official with a private election watchdog said.
The usually well-informed weekly Zimbabwe Independent reported on Friday that Mugabe was considering issuing an edict that would replace the three-week period between the first and second rounds required by the Constitution, with a three-month hiatus.
“That will give him all that time to abolish the reformed laws that made last week’s elections relatively transparent and difficult to rig and to carry out a real ZANU-PF-style election, with violent intimidation and outright rigging,” a Western diplomat said.
“It looks as if he’s already started,” the diplomat said.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS