President-elect Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) campaign focused on boosting the nation’s economy. The economic achievements of former US president Bill Clinton and globalization were the major reasons for the unprecedented economic development in the US and the rest of the world at the end of the 20th century.
But psychologist and Daniel Kahneman, the 2002 Nobel Prize Laureate in economics, has said that the goal of public policy is not to maximize GDP, but rather to increase happiness.
Economic growth is one way of doing so. It is a necessary condition for happiness, but not the only one. We should not forget the big picture and should avoid worshipping GDP as a cure-all.
The thinking behind Ma’s development strategy, like his “633” economic policy and his proposal for 12 major construction projects will prove incapable of surmounting the challenges of “irrational exuberance” that resulted from the efforts to maximize GDP at the end of the 20th century.
The price is excessive development that has led to environmental pollution and global warming, as well as excessive exuberance that has fueled corporate extortion, a growing rich-poor gap and increasing social polarization.
Taiwan should use its uniqueness and specific advantages as it carves out a path for future development.
First, it should should not strive for GDP development benchmarks like South Korea and Singapore. These are benchmarks of the past century. Instead, the nation should employ the economic benchmarks of the 21st century, based on the goals of sustainable development and human welfare. These benchmarks include health, education and the environment.
Taiwan should transform its economy into an economy that focuses on promoting individual freedom and happiness and aims to develop environmental sustainability.
In addition, the nation should implement a fair and just public welfare system. The old economic theory says fairness runs counter to efficiency and public welfare is an impediment to growth. But the example of Denmark and other Scandinavian countries disproves this theory. A fair and just society can stimulate people’s vitality and creativity and drive the economy.
Taiwan belongs to the 10 percent most affluent countries in the world. It should learn from the Scandinavian countries when it comes to public welfare and fairness. Denmark and other countries not only seek to improve public welfare and environmental protection, they are also among the world’s most competitive economies.
Last June, Leicester University in the UK published the first World Map of Happiness, and listed Denmark as the happiest of 178 countries. Denmark has essentially eliminated poverty and the worst case of official corruption uncovered there in the past three decades involved a low-level immigration official accepting NT$230,000 from a student from China.
Development must be in harmony with the environment. Taiwan should use its natural resources to help the public and it should promote vitality and creativity by making use of its diverse ethnic and cultural groups. It should seek to create great literature, art, music, dance, theater and film, for both the domestic and international markets. Developing the nation’s creative spirit should be more important than lowering personnel costs.
The key to avoiding unequal wealth distribution is to increase overall education levels and creative ability. The nation’s west coast is already overdeveloped and there is no room for more railroads or petrochemical factories. Development on the east coast should not follow the model used on the west coast. To facilitate traffic along the east coast, a ferry service would be better than the proposed Suhua Freeway.
Ma should have the courage to adjust his policies. He should stop viewing the world from the perspective of Taiwan’s relations with the US and China.
Ma would do better to visit Denmark and learn from its economy than to visit Singapore before he takes office. He should seek to help Taiwan move toward a bright and happy future, not a dark and bitter one. This will be an important test of Ma’s capabilities.
Ruan Ming is a consultant at the Taiwan Research Institute.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past