Despite strenuous Chinese efforts to stifle the flow of information out of Tibet on the uprising there, the stream of dispatches continues and has begun to confront Chinese leaders with a dilemma: What do they do about the Olympics scheduled to open in Beijing on Aug. 8?
Does China go ahead and risk more adverse reports from the horde of 10,000 athletes, 20,000 foreign journalists, and tens of thousands of spectators who will descend on Beijing?
Or do the Chinese renege on their promise to open the country for the games? Or, as has already been speculated in Asia, does China call off the games rather than be subjected to close-up international scrutiny.
US President George W. Bush, who has accepted China's invitation to the games, is also being confronted with a dilemma.
Does the president, who has emphasized human rights in his foreign policy, go to Beijing and appear to condone the actions of a repressive regime? Or does he stay home and incur the wrath of China's rulers with whom the US already has tenuous relations? All of this begins to come in to focus tomorrow when the Olympic torch is to be lit in Greece, home of the ancient Olympics, and to start wending its 130-day, 132,288km journey ending in Beijing in August. It initiates the showcasing of China's emergence as an economic powerhouse and prominent political actor on the international stage.
In sum, the Beijing Olympic games are all about national pride.
Under normal circumstances, anti-Chinese riots in Lhasa might have been passed off as a local disturbance in a China that has recently experienced 75,000 instances of civil strife a year. This time, however, a correspondent for the Economist magazine was on the scene by happenstance.
So were groups of Japanese and Western tourists who were interviewed after they came out of Tibet.
US newspapers had correspondents, forbidden to enter Tibet, interview Tibetans living in the provinces that border on Tibet. More dispatches were cobbled together in Hong Kong. But Russia, host to the winter Olympics in 2014, seemed to ignore China's problems.
A headline in Pravda said: "Chinese prepare to live in hell for 2008 Summer Olympics," meaning no smoking in public places.
In China itself, Chinese TV and the Xinhua news agency covered the outbursts but played them down.
"A handful of lawless people, chanting separatist slogans in downtown Lhasa, burnt civilian houses and shops, destroyed vehicles, killed 13 innocent people, and seriously injured a dozen of law-enforcers," Xinhua reported.
The Economist was more vivid.
"Chinese shopkeepers in Lhasa's old Tibetan quarter knew better than the security forces that the city had become a tinder-box. As word spread rapidly through the narrow alleyways on March 14th that a crowd was throwing stones at Chinese businesses, they shuttered up their shops and fled. The authorities, caught by surprise, held back as the city was engulfed by its biggest anti-Chinese protests in decades," the London-based magazine reported.
The dispatch by the correspondent, unnamed as is the magazine's style, went on with trenchant analysis: "Years of rapid economic growth, which China had hoped would dampen separatist demands, have achieved the opposite. Efforts to integrate the region more closely with the rest of China, by building the world's highest railway connecting Beijing with Lhasa, have only fueled ethnic tensions in the Tibetan capital."
The dispatches recalled the gathering of the foreign press and television in Beijing in 1989 when then Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev visited China. Those journalists were on hand to report on the eruption of demonstrations by pro-democracy activists in Tiananmen Square that generated worldwide attention, especially when Chinese troops killed uncounted hundreds of demonstrators.
At a briefing on Thursday, Bush press secretary Dana Perino indicated that the US president still intended to go to the Olympics, but was careful not to commit the president. When a correspondent suggested that the president's presence in Beijing would be seen as a political statement, Perino said: "Certainly the president wants to make sure that our athletes have a really good experience."
That seemed to leave the president enough wiggle room to stay home if the politics of this election year so demanded.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS