Negotiations on a cross-strait peace agreement can not be completed overnight. Only with the "2005 consensus" as a basis can we gradually build mutual trust and benefits and push for stable cross-strait peace development.
The consensus is not an official consensus document signed by the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Rather, it is a tacit agreement that has been accepted by the two sides as a model for negotiations since January 2005. It has the following special characteristics: It leaves disputes aside, sets no conditions, demands mutual respect and relies on pragmatism, government direction and civil assistance.
The fact is that Taiwan and China did not reach a concrete written consensus in 1992, nor did the two parties reach a tacit agreement on the "one China" principle or the sovereignty dispute. At that time, they merely decided to set political disputes aside and push for talks on practical concerns.
Since 1992, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has insisted that the so-called "1992 consensus" says there is one China, with each side making its own interpretation, while the Chinese government's interpretation is that both sides agree to the "one China" principle. Over the past 15 years, no Chinese official has said that the consensus means that there is one China, with each side making its interpretation.
Although the two sides held many talks on practical matters after 1993, no agreement was reached because Beijing refused to deal with the jurisdiction of Taiwan. On Jan. 2, 2005, however, Beijing finally gave up its demand that the "one China" principle be a precondition and restarted cross-strait talks on practical matters.
On the basis of this new consensus, the two sides have already reached three agreements on cross-strait charter flights since 2005, including charter flights for the Lunar New Year holidays and four special cases, with a total of 443 flights. Today, the two sides are involved in three negotiations: Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan, passenger flights and cargo charter flights.
After the presidential election on March 22, China's attempts to affect Taiwan's election results will no longer be a factor and the two sides are likely to reach agreements very soon. As these negotiations on functional affairs are completed, talks will be extended to other issues.
Taiwan and China will then be able to push for stable cross-strait peace development on the basis of a "2005 consensus" rather than the controversial so-called "1992 consensus."
Tung Chen-yuan is the vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused