The Hong Kong public learned something this week that may shock people even outside Asia: Bored young movie stars who have a libido and know how to operate a camera sometimes combine the two for their personal amusement.
It is difficult to believe that many Hong Kong men were not quietly in awe of Edison Chen's (
Yet this silly tale of projected sexual ego and unsecured computers has now blown up into an international news story as prosecutions commence over the distribution of "obscene" materials.
The only obscene thing about this affair was that Hong Kong and international media almost completely ignored the simultaneous release of Ching Cheong (
The Edison Chen that groveled at Thursday's press conference was not a man involved in obscenity; he was a coward who didn't have the guts to tell the truth: He enjoyed photographing himself and his female companions, and would have continued to do so had his hard disk not been stolen and ransacked. His pleas for people to learn from his experience and his apology for not being a role model were as ridiculous as they were craven.
The curious thing about the fuss is that Hong Kong has traditionally been a progressive place in terms of sex, erotica and pornography. Now, under indirect Chinese rule, the maxim that political tyranny must extend to public expressions of sexuality has been reinvigorated as Hong Kong cracks down on the most minor sexual infractions in the press, and particularly on the medium that China fears above all others: the Internet.
Back in Taiwan, police have arrested a man trying to make hay out of the pictorial material taken from Chen's computer. But the police reasoning for the raid on that unlucky Internet user deserves comment.
Rather than target the man over the commercial misuse of "copyright" material, the prosecutors want to jail him on indecency charges, which smacks of professional nest-feathering through the prosecution of victimless crimes. What about the real online crooks -- sexual predators, pedophiles, organized crime activity and piracy groups?
Taiwan has been heading down the same progressive road that Hong Kong now seems to have forsaken, as evidenced by the release of films such as Shortbus, 9 Songs and A Wayward Cloud -- each containing unsimulated sexual material -- in theaters and on DVD. This suggests that Government Information Office (GIO) film classifiers have warmed to the idea of artistic and dramatic context in handling adult material.
Meanwhile, Taiwanese police are threatening to prosecute anyone who downloads any image whatsoever of sexual activity, a futile strategy that infringes upon the private lives of ordinary people -- and one that would be selectively enforced. There is a clear and growing disjuncture between the civilian sensibilities of the GIO's public servants and the prudish legalism of the police and prosecutors.
Forget clumsy images of Edison Chen romancing Hong Kong "talent." We would prefer Taiwanese police offer a reason why they haven't prosecuted anyone yet for "downloading" and enjoying Ang Lee's (
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS