A bubble in the US housing market -- fueled in part by "subprime" mortgages -- was the catalyst for the financial market turbulence we face today. But the bubble was not confined to the US. In Europe, house prices have also increased sharply over the last decade -- more dramatically than in the US in many cases. The same is true of other Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and emerging markets, where rapidly increasing incomes have put pressure on asset prices.
Indeed, with a few exceptions (essentially Germany and Japan), housing prices have risen almost everywhere to levels never seen before. How could such a global pattern emerge when real estate is the most local of all assets?
Recent research suggests that the global housing boom was closely linked to the unprecedented increase in the supply of liquidity by major central banks. To be sure, financial innovation, like lending to buyers who would not normally have qualified for mortgage loans (subprime borrowers) also played a role. But subprime mortgages would probably not have been supplied on the same scale if central banks had not created an environment of ample liquidity and persistently low interest rates.
The subprime crisis has so far affected mainly financial markets in the US and Europe. This is not surprising if one considers that on both sides of the Atlantic prices have reached historical peaks and, until recently, had accelerated.
This is no mere coincidence. There has always been a correlation between US and European house prices. Over the last three decades, prices in the US and Europe have tended to follow three slow-moving, related boom-bust cycles. All previous peaks were followed by several years of declining prices (in real terms).
There is no reason to assume that this cycle will be any different.
Since last year, prices have declined in the US. Because data for the euro area will become available only much later, it is not yet possible to determine whether prices have already turned on the continent as well. But if the past pattern holds, house prices should start to fall very soon in (continental) Europe as well. In both the US and Europe it seems that prices went 20 percent to 30 percent above their longer-term average values. Such a large overshooting is likely to be followed by some undershooting. This would imply that prices will probably have to fall at least by 20 percent to 30 percent, but possibly considerably more before they find a bottom.
European policy makers thus have cause for concern. While there is little evidence in the euro area of large-scale sub-prime lending, there is considerable evidence to suggest that house prices have an important impact on domestic demand, albeit with wide variations among individual countries.
Almost everywhere, higher house prices have been associated with strong consumption. Lower house prices throughout Europe are thus likely to be accompanied by weaker consumption demand, as in the US. In Germany, for example, house prices have remained relatively low and consumption weak.
The impact of house prices on construction activity has been more varied. In Spain and Ireland, construction investment has increased to a level (18 percent to 20 percent of GDP) far above that of the US and not seen in any other OECD country except Japan before its bubble burst in 1989. In these two countries, lower housing prices are likely to be associated with a sharp and prolonged drop in domestic demand, which should be stronger even than what can be expected in the US.
By contrast, in France and Italy, where house prices have increased almost as much as in the US, there is no evidence of a housing overhang.
In short, the downturn in house prices will not be limited to the US. And, on both sides of the Atlantic, that decline is likely to undermine consumer spending.
Daniel Gros is director of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry