The British Olympic Association (BOA) was forced into an embarrassing backflip this week after news emerged that athletes taking part in August's Beijing Olympics were being required to sign a pledge promising not to criticize host China over its human rights record.
After originally promising to leave athletes who spoke out against the Chinese government out of its squad, it will be interesting to see whether the BOA sticks to its promise to review its final athlete's agreement, especially now that a potential member of the squad -- top badminton player Richard Vaughan -- has spoken out against "Chinese inaction" against the ongoing violence in the Darfur region of Sudan.
Vaughan put the cat among the pigeons on Tuesday when he accused the Chinese government, a major sponsor of the regime in Khartoum, of doing little to stop the killing in the region, saying it was "very difficult to keep a polite silence about a conflict that continues to cost so many lives."
The controversy comes as human rights groups step up pressure over the Chinese government's failure to live up to promises it made when it bid to host the games in 2001.
Vaughan's comments are guaranteed to hit a raw nerve because China has already made several pre-emptive strikes in an attempt to head off criticism, saying it opposes the "politicizing of the Olympic Games." Indeed, Beijing is especially sensitive about endeavors that link its hosting of the Olympics with its support for the Sudanese government, something director Steven Spielberg did on Tuesday when he withdrew from his role as artistic adviser to the Games.
But the notion that the Beijing Games are anything other than a political vehicle for the Chinese Communist Party is laughable in itself. The idea that the Olympics would act as a force for political change and that hosting the Games would somehow help to bring down the authoritarian regime as it did in the build-up to the 1988 Games in Seoul has turned out to be pie in the sky, especially when one considers countries such as the UK, New Zealand and Belgium were or are willing to gag their athletes on Beijing's behalf.
The BOA's kowtowing to China comes in sharp contrast to comments made by UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband on Tuesday in a speech at Oxford University, where he told the audience that errors made in the pursuit of the "War on Terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan must not discourage British efforts to foster democracy -- by military means if necessary.
Miliband went on to say that China should recognize "that democracy is not a threat to stability but a way to guarantee it," adding democracy was the "best long-term defense against global terrorism and conflict."
Pity Miliband didn't talk like this when he entertained Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi (
One can only hope the British government will follow the BOA in its abrupt U-turn so that Taiwan can look forward to support from London instead of scorn as it strives to shore up the nation's defenses.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with