THE GOALS OUTLINED in the Cultural and Creative Industry Development Plan that formed part of the government's overall Challenge 2008 National Develop-ment Plan have not been met.
When the plan was announced on May 8, 2002, the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research estimated that cultural and creative industries would grow in production value by 264 percent from NT$440 billion (US$13.57 billion) in 2001 to NT$1.16 trillion this year. This estimate was too optimistic and the real figures are much more modest. The six-year period covered by the plan ends this year but the most recent figures, from the annual report on the development of cultural and creative industries in Taiwan in 2006, show the industry as being worth only NT$581.1 billion in 2005.
In an address to the Cabinet on July 24, 2002, the premier said that the Challenge 2008 plan was intended to be revised from year to year. In addition, the premier urged goal management to ensure that the scheme was properly implemented. What actually happened was that the goals of the Cultural and Creative Industry Development Plan have been revised ever lower. Whereas the original goals were for 200 percent growth in industry output value and employment opportunities, the employment growth goal was later lowered to 100 percent. Finally, the target for both categories was set at 150 percent growth.
This continual lowering of targets is at odds with international trends. According to a Reuters report on Jan. 14, the global trade in creative products and services increased from US$234.8 billion in 1996 to US$445.2 billion in 2005, with an 8.7 percent growth between 2000 and 2005. UN Conference on Trade and Development Secretary-General Supachai Panitchpakdi said that the creative economy has strong growth potential. Developing countries should take China as their example: In 2005, China's export of creative products ranked first globally, at US$61.4 billion -- 18 percent of the world's total.
The Chinese government only officially included the cultural industry in its social and economic development strategies at the 15th Central Committee meeting in October 2000. In just five years, its creative industry had become a world leader in terms of exports.
The cultural and creative industries of Taiwan should continue to strive toward success.
Jerry Hsia is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University's Professional Program in Cultural and Creative Studies.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under