Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (
Malawi's refusal to receive Huang means a switch of recognition to China now looks inevitable and it will mark the latest strike in Beijing's war of attrition to win the allegiance of the nation's allies.
But one could argue that -- when it is made official -- neither China nor Malawi will prosper, as neither China's geopolitical ambitions nor the plight of the citizens of Malawi will be advanced from the establishment of relations.
Apart from the opportunity to further decrease Taiwan's international space and reduce its number of allies, China's other reason for courting African countries is to secure access to the globe's diminishing natural resources, vital if it is to keep its burgeoning economy ticking over and its massive population pacified. In this respect Malawi, with its unexploited deposits of uranium and bauxite, is a useful acquisition.
Beijing reportedly offered the government of Malawi a financial package totaling US$6 billion in return for breaking ties with Taipei and it is understandable that a poverty-stricken nation like Malawi would be tempted by such a generous offer, given that its annual GDP stands at around US$7 billion. It is unlikely, however, that any of this cash will trickle down to the Malawian population and past experience has shown they will not receive the same medical, agricultural and technical help from Beijing as they have from Taipei's missions.
Many other African countries, such as Angola, Mozambique and Sudan, have given China's unfettered access to their natural resources in return for cash, construction projects and economic development, but more often than not the results fail to live up to the promises.
Human rights activists and foreign aid workers in these countries have voiced concerns that, like European nations before them, China's involvement in Africa often only serves to enrich the continent's already corrupt leaders. BBC reports have also detailed how Chinese construction firms bring in Chinese workers because they are unwilling to train the locals and impart vital skills to the Africans. Peasant Chinese farmers are even being sent to work the African land in an attempt to relieve pressure on land in China. In some cases, locals allege that prisoners are being imported to do hard labor.
This has led African activists to question China's motives and has generated accusations of a new era of imperialism.
Ministry officials expect Malawi to announce its decision to recognize China within the next few days, just in time for Saturday's legislative election -- chosen by Beijing to cause maximum embarrassment to the government.
But China should have learned from its previous ham-fisted attempts -- both direct and indirect -- to meddle in Taiwan's elections, that intervention has the opposite effect, producing a galvanizing effect on large sections of the Taiwanese population. The more China attacks, the more people come to detest its belligerent bullying.
In contrast to viewing the latest loss of an ally as an indication of Taiwan's weakness and another step on the road to international obscurity, people will view it as China's latest insult to Taiwan's sovereignty.
Losing one more ally to China does not really do that much harm to Taiwan's interests, but it makes Beijing's job of achieving its dream of "eventual unification" that much harder.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in