It is often easier to agree on aspirations than actions. In the 36 years since former US president Richard Nixon adopted the proposition that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China" (Joint Communique of the United States of America and the People's Republic of China, Feb. 28, 1972, also known as the "Shanghai Communique") the proposition has spawned a number of "one China" policies and has proved notoriously unhelpful to the formulation of good policies and actions.
But if we give the proposition its best interpretation, we might find that it does state an aspiration held in common by the people of Taiwan and the people of China. If there is such a common aspiration, it might be stated as follows: The people of Taiwan and the people of China hold in common the hope that their governments may, at such time as political differences between them are satisfactorily resolved, merge into a union that will ensure security, peace and prosperity for all.
If there is such a common aspiration among the people of Taiwan and China, then their respective governments should take concerted action toward realization of that aspiration. The two governments should agree that the present state of continuing tensions be replaced by a treaty acknowledging the conclusion of the Chinese Civil War and establishing a process of dialogue to resolve the differences between Taiwan and China. Upon the satisfactory resolution of these differences, the dialogue would then be directed to the merger of Taiwan and China to form a new union.
Such a treaty would eliminate all obstacles to the formalization of de jure statehood as desired by Taiwan, and at the same time would establish a process directed toward the ultimate union of Taiwan and China as desired by Beijing. The peacefulness of the process could be ensured by a non-aggression treaty, together with UN monitoring and control of any armaments of either party that could be targeted at the other.
Marty Wolff
Taipei County
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with