Scenes of members of the public cornering politicians, often with complaints about their jobs and the economy, have been televised recently. This is a worrying development as it is likely that most viewers would unthinkingly side with the protesters, regardless of the validity of their complaints.
In any economy, employees must outnumber employers. Stability therefore depends on employers being able to pay reasonable wages to the employed. When wages are not reasonable, wage earners will choose to look for other employers that offer better salaries. When workers cannot find employers that offer better conditions, they complain.
Some people always blame the government for such problems and choose to protest. But should the government carry the can?
Simple research reveals that as many as 300 listed companies had profit margins under 10 percent last year. Of these, as many as 200 companies invested less than 1 percent of their profits in research and development -- and many of these companies are well-known. Based on these observations, the outlook for these companies is not rosy: As little or no research and development is taking place, orders can only be gained through high volume sales at low margins. A company of this sort has little option but to move to China and take advantage of the cheap labor. This results in a lack of job opportunities in Taiwan.
Employers who deny Taiwanese employment or pay rises typically pass the buck to the government -- and the government foolishly believes that its own policies have caused the problem. This is utterly confounding.
Workers need to understand that no government can save businesses that do not strive to improve. A business that does not invest in research and development is a sitting duck. Low profit margins result from a lack of pricing power, with businesses forced to passively accept the humble profits that large foreign companies are willing to pay. This plight befalls companies that fail to innovate and create quality brands.
Considered in this light, it should be obvious that the government cannot be held responsible for all economic problems. Wage earners have the right to monitor government and ensure sound economic policies are in place so that quality companies thrive in Taiwan. As for businesses that rely on low margin, high-volume strategies and refuse to invest in research and development -- their political influence must be watched closely. When these businesses have the ear of government, wage earners suffer.
Huang Chin-yin is an associate professor at the Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information at Tunghai University.
Translated by Ted Yang and Angela Hong
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath