Five years ago, after a landslide victory put Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki in power, a vast crowd gathered in Nairobi's Uhuru Park to hear their new president vow to purge corruption.
The departing president's convoy was pelted with mud and former Kenyan president Daniel arap Moi was jeered with cries of "thief" by Kenyans who had triumphantly flexed their electoral muscles. Some called it their "second liberation."
Two years ago, Kenya's voters demonstrated their independence once again, by giving Kibaki a bloody nose in a referendum to extend his powers.
The tragedy of Kenya's elections last year is that it nearly completed the revolution that began in 2002. A relatively youthful opposition, which cut across ethnic lines, was sweeping the board -- and the political victims included men like David Mwiraria, who was implicated in corruption, Nicholas Biwott, one of Moi's most feared allies and the former president's son, Gideon Moi.
There was talk of elderly hippos being overtaken by young cheetahs. It smelled like a new era.
Instead, it appears that a government caught napping by a groundswell of opposition support has tried to interfere with the result at the last minute. There are parallels across Africa.
In Ethiopia in 2005 the opposition made dramatic gains, but was denied power amid claims that the vote was tampered with after the polls had closed. Similarly, Nigeria's elections last year were criticized for large-scale rigging.
There is speculation in Kenya that the ruling party may have sought to manipulate the electoral commission before the poll, but reports by election monitors point to meddling with the vote tallying. Kenya has set the worst of examples.
The violence is even more dismaying. The government's claim that it is "well-planned, financed and rehearsed" by the opposition was exaggerated. Kenya is not Rwanda, and this is no orchestrated genocide. But there may be a grain of truth in the claim that the opposition Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has a role in the bloodshed.
Kenya, in common with many impoverished developing world countries, has plenty of young thugs available for hire.
David Anderson, director of the African Studies Centre at St. Antony's College, Oxford, said: "The ODM is causing as many fires to break out in as many places as possible so the government is kept on the run and forced to come to the negotiating table. Raila [Odinga] is saying he doesn't want violence. That may be true in his heart -- but not in his head."
Kenya's future lies with two men who were once allies. In 2002, Odinga, now opposition leader, helped Kibaki win. By 2005, he led a Cabinet rebellion against Kibaki, quitting power to call for a vote of "no" in the referendum.
Odinga ostensibly quit on a point of principle, but he was also frustrated at his lack of influence in government and felt he had been cheated. That history makes it unlikely that he will gladly seek a compromise now.
Kibaki unquestionably has a fine mind. He was top of his class at Uganda's respected Makerere University and a scholarship student at the London School of Economics. He was in a car accident and suffered a stroke on the eve of the 2002 election, forcing him to slow down. His skillful grassroots campaigning in the run-up to this election has tempered his aloof image, but he remains a distant president, even compared with the autocratic Moi.
Now 76, his style of government has been to surround himself with a trusted cabal. Some believe this clique is now egging him on.
Tom Cargill, Africa program manager at Chatham House, the international think tank in London, said: "The big problem is that Kibaki is being pushed more than he's pushing. On the other hand Odinga is getting old and knows this is his last shot. He feels outraged -- he thought he had it."
Five years ago, Kibaki was inaugurated as president in the park where Prince Philip handed power to Jomo Kenyatta in 1963, ceremonially ending British rule. After this election result, Odinga called for a million people to march on the same park on Thursday. A massive police presence kept protesters out of the center of Nairobi and prevented the gathering, but opposition leaders have said the protests will continue. Unless a compromise is reached, Uhuru Park could see blood and tears replace the joy of 2002.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to