Five years ago, after a landslide victory put Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki in power, a vast crowd gathered in Nairobi's Uhuru Park to hear their new president vow to purge corruption.
The departing president's convoy was pelted with mud and former Kenyan president Daniel arap Moi was jeered with cries of "thief" by Kenyans who had triumphantly flexed their electoral muscles. Some called it their "second liberation."
Two years ago, Kenya's voters demonstrated their independence once again, by giving Kibaki a bloody nose in a referendum to extend his powers.
The tragedy of Kenya's elections last year is that it nearly completed the revolution that began in 2002. A relatively youthful opposition, which cut across ethnic lines, was sweeping the board -- and the political victims included men like David Mwiraria, who was implicated in corruption, Nicholas Biwott, one of Moi's most feared allies and the former president's son, Gideon Moi.
There was talk of elderly hippos being overtaken by young cheetahs. It smelled like a new era.
Instead, it appears that a government caught napping by a groundswell of opposition support has tried to interfere with the result at the last minute. There are parallels across Africa.
In Ethiopia in 2005 the opposition made dramatic gains, but was denied power amid claims that the vote was tampered with after the polls had closed. Similarly, Nigeria's elections last year were criticized for large-scale rigging.
There is speculation in Kenya that the ruling party may have sought to manipulate the electoral commission before the poll, but reports by election monitors point to meddling with the vote tallying. Kenya has set the worst of examples.
The violence is even more dismaying. The government's claim that it is "well-planned, financed and rehearsed" by the opposition was exaggerated. Kenya is not Rwanda, and this is no orchestrated genocide. But there may be a grain of truth in the claim that the opposition Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has a role in the bloodshed.
Kenya, in common with many impoverished developing world countries, has plenty of young thugs available for hire.
David Anderson, director of the African Studies Centre at St. Antony's College, Oxford, said: "The ODM is causing as many fires to break out in as many places as possible so the government is kept on the run and forced to come to the negotiating table. Raila [Odinga] is saying he doesn't want violence. That may be true in his heart -- but not in his head."
Kenya's future lies with two men who were once allies. In 2002, Odinga, now opposition leader, helped Kibaki win. By 2005, he led a Cabinet rebellion against Kibaki, quitting power to call for a vote of "no" in the referendum.
Odinga ostensibly quit on a point of principle, but he was also frustrated at his lack of influence in government and felt he had been cheated. That history makes it unlikely that he will gladly seek a compromise now.
Kibaki unquestionably has a fine mind. He was top of his class at Uganda's respected Makerere University and a scholarship student at the London School of Economics. He was in a car accident and suffered a stroke on the eve of the 2002 election, forcing him to slow down. His skillful grassroots campaigning in the run-up to this election has tempered his aloof image, but he remains a distant president, even compared with the autocratic Moi.
Now 76, his style of government has been to surround himself with a trusted cabal. Some believe this clique is now egging him on.
Tom Cargill, Africa program manager at Chatham House, the international think tank in London, said: "The big problem is that Kibaki is being pushed more than he's pushing. On the other hand Odinga is getting old and knows this is his last shot. He feels outraged -- he thought he had it."
Five years ago, Kibaki was inaugurated as president in the park where Prince Philip handed power to Jomo Kenyatta in 1963, ceremonially ending British rule. After this election result, Odinga called for a million people to march on the same park on Thursday. A massive police presence kept protesters out of the center of Nairobi and prevented the gathering, but opposition leaders have said the protests will continue. Unless a compromise is reached, Uhuru Park could see blood and tears replace the joy of 2002.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers