The legislative elections appear to be not so much a contest between President Chen Shui-bian (
There is good reason for the DPP to be pessimistic about its prospects in next month's elections. The party has been in power for more than seven years; consequently it has few issues to explore with a fresh voice. The legislative elections -- which require strong policy initiatives and local campaigns -- have been neglected as a consequence.
The new single-district, two-ballot system is also unlikely to benefit the DPP, which will struggle to garner anywhere near half of the seats in the legislature. But there is some interest over which DPP candidates can take advantage of the largely irrelevant issue of mausoleums containing the tyrants of yesteryear.
Firm KMT resistance to changing the name of the former Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and the wording on the front gate's plaques seems to be consistent with a DPP strategy of making the KMT appear fanatical and beholden to peripheral causes.
This appearance has been reinforced by the KMT's response to the removal of military guards from the mausoleums of Chiang and his son, former president Chiang Ching-kuo (
The DPP government's decision to remove guards from the mausoleums and have the Taoyuan County Government take over their management are eminently reasonable -- and from the perspective of the victims of the White Terror, absolutely necessary.
When Chiang Fang Chih-yi (
The Cabinet had planned to move the Chiangs to the Wuchihshan Military Cemetery, which the Chiang family had agreed to, and the government allocated nearly US$1 million for renovations.
But because KMT Legislator John Chiang (
The KMT was a foreign government that considered itself temporarily based in Taiwan. It wanted to rule all of China. Such sentiment still exists in the party; no wonder that the fourth-generation Demos Chiang (
The family matters of the Chiangs have become KMT matters on the eve of national elections for the legislature and the presidency. This shows that the Chiang family is still intimately connected to the KMT's vision for Taiwan.
The DPP surely must be congratulating itself that, after all this time, it still has Chiang Kai-shek to thank for exposing the KMT's hollow core -- and obscuring its own inability to develop a substantial legislative campaign.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military