Yet another British-era law has been toppled like a drunk from a bar stool in a change that gives women the freedom to make a living mixing the perfect cosmopolitan.
In overturning a 1914 law that prohibited women from tending bar in the capital New Delhi, the Supreme Court of India this month not only raised a glass to changing social mores in this country, but also gave Indian women access to one of the most lucrative jobs in the new economy.
Prosperity has resulted in the proliferation of trendy bars across urban India and, as upscale as some of them are, with a glass of Bordeaux costing as much as a laborer's weekly wage, drinking in the minds of middle-class Indians is beginning to lose its whiff of vice and danger.
On any given night, in any fashionable bar room in big-city India, women can be seen drinking merrily -- sometimes even without the company of men.
Alongside annual restaurant guides, there are now guides to bars. Time Out magazine reviews bars in Mumbai and Delhi, which would not be such a big deal were it not in India where, until a generation ago, going out for a drink was considered the preserve either of the very rich, who could afford private clubs, or of the ne'er-do-well, venturing out to a rough-and-tumble saloon.
Indeed, a hotel management student named Aditi Soni, 20, said even her grandmother, a schoolteacher, had come around to the idea that working in a fancy hotel, with a fancy bar, was not such a bad idea for a woman.
A bartender, Soni has pointed out to her elders, can easily rake in more than US$1,000 a month, which is more than triple the salary of a call center worker, for instance, or that of a waitress at a high-end restaurant.
She had originally considered bartending as a career, but chose to study restaurant management instead after realizing that it was illegal in Delhi for a woman to tend bar. This week, Soni saluted the court ruling with a big, broad smile, and said she was glad for the new opportunities.
"It's lucrative, in the money sense and the fun sense," she said. "It's very happening. It's an action-packed job."
And yet, the stir over who can work as a bartender signals an abiding ambivalence over the subject of alcohol -- and women serving it. Each of India's 29 states has its own laws governing the sale of alcohol, and many, to varying degrees, restrict women working behind the bar.
In Mumbai, for instance, India's entertainment capital, women are prohibited from working in bars past 8:30pm, a law so rarely enforced that Shatbhi Basu, a celebrity bartender who is the host of a drinking show on television and teaches a bartending course, was not quite sure when women were supposed to clock out. Many employers ignore the 8:30pm law, she said, but afford their employees safety precautions, like sending them home in a company car.
Nor do the city police seem to enforce another charmingly antiquated regulation that requires drinkers to present a doctor-certified permit that declares them medically in need of drink.
In Chennai and Bangalore, two of India's high-technology capitals, bars -- which usually crawl with young people -- are supposed to close by 11pm and 11:30pm, but often do not.
In any case, Basu pointed out, few women tend bar anywhere in India, and she did not expect the court ruling to prompt women to join the profession in large numbers. In her bartending course, women remain rare.
"It's not about the court; it's about the family you come from," contended Basu, 48, who began tending bar in 1981. "Girls want to. At the end of the day it's the family that rules. It's all about the honor of the family -- what will happen, will you be able to get married, all that stuff."
The Hotel and Restaurant Association for western India, which includes Mumbai, is considering an appeal to its state government to relax the 8:30pm rule. The Supreme Court ruling does not directly bear on other state laws governing the sale of alcohol.
The Supreme Court ruling was prompted by a lawsuit filed by the Hotel and Restaurant Association, an industry group, in Delhi. The government had justified the law on the grounds that working late hours was potentially dangerous for women.
After the Delhi High Court ruled against the law, a private citizen took it to the Supreme Court, where lawyers defending the law cited the case of Jessica Lall, a model-turned-bartender who was shot and killed at an exclusive restaurant here in 1999 after she refused to serve a demanding patron.
In its verdict this month, the Indian Supreme Court cited a US Supreme Court case deriding what it called "`romantic paternalism' which, in practical effect, put women, not on a pedestal, but in a cage."
If women could work as police and chief executives, the court opined, how could the law keep them from tending bar? The justices called the 1914 law "invidious discrimination perpetrating sexual differences."
For Anushika Pradhan, 25, who came to Delhi a few years ago from a small northeastern city called Gangtok, the court ruling meant finally coming out of the bartending closet. For nearly six months, while working as a hostess at a five-star hotel coffee shop, she had been learning the craft in secret downstairs at a pub called Dublin.
The day after the court rendered its ruling, Pradhan, dressed in a black pantsuit, was behind the bar, tugging at the beer tap, fixing whiskey and sodas and smiling self-consciously for all those who recognized her. She had been anointed by local news media as the capital's first female bartender.
"Hey, you were on TV!" one man exclaimed.
Another, inebriated, tried to lean over the bar a few times before security guards urged him along to his room.
Wrestling was being broadcast on the flat-screen televisions on either end of the bar, with one man holding another's head between his knees.
One of the waiters summoned Pradhan and returned a cosmopolitan that she had just made.
"Too strong," was the customer's verdict.
Pradhan looked befuddled.
"Too strong?" she asked, and added a dash of soda.
Saher Mahmood contributed reporting.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry