Democracy does not fall from the sky, nor does it mature overnight. In the last seven years, Taiwan's road to democracy has been filled with chaos stemming from a lack of values and reckless political opposition. "Democratic civil war" aptly describes the process.
Our democracy is in a state of conflict that highlights the immaturity of our system. This is inevitable during the transition from an authoritarian to a democratic system.
But Taiwan's situation is unique: Other than the reactionary forces of the deposed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), there is also political intervention by the media -- themselves a relic of the party-state system -- that further intensifies the infighting.
Two major causes of this democratic civil war are the pro-unification media and the KMT's attempts to regain power. In a mature democracy, the media is a political watchdog that prevents corruption and asserts social justice. But Taiwan's fourth estate has no public credibility. Just as it was once the mouthpiece of the party-state, it now makes up the front-line troops in the attempt to restore the party-state.
The bloody deeds of the KMT during its 40 years of rule include the 228 Incident, the White Terror era, the overseas blacklist, the Kaohsiung Incident, the death of Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) and the murder of Lin I-hsiung's (林義雄) family members.
These atrocities have not been fully addressed legally or historically and the KMT still does not dare confront them. The media are also afraid to confront the past.
The pro-unification media outlets escape responsibility with specious arguments, brainwashing the younger generation so that the KMT can wash it hands of its past as though nothing happened.
The pro-unification media conceals the KMT's historical responsibility while highlighting clashes between parties over minor issues and misleading the public.
But their political intervention is unsurprising given the background of high-level media executives.
The majority of executives in the electronic media and the United Daily News as well as the China Times were "media elite youths" specially fostered by the KMT. Many of them, especially those at TTV, CTS and CTV, as well as the two papers, received KMT scholarships while studying abroad. Upon their return, these individuals repaid the party-state through their work. Most of them are high-level executives or famed commentators on television and in the two papers. How can these individuals be expected to show any goodwill to the Democratic Progressive Party?
Then there are the KMT's party assets. No other country in the world would allow a political party to keep such a large amount of wealth and use it to compete unfairly against its rivals. If it were not for the fact that the media help to obstruct any disadvantageous legislation, the reclaiming of the KMT's ill-gotten assets would not be so difficult. The media cannot be overlooked in the party's ability to retain and utilize its wealth -- their "cooperation" is the greatest obstacle to the deepening of Taiwanese democracy.
If the KMT is not thoroughly dismantled, it will be near impossible for Taiwan and Taiwanese media to normalize.
Taiwan is in the midst of a painful democratic civil war. Next year's elections hold the key to whether Taiwan can divest itself of the KMT and continue to promote democracy. Without the advantage of strong media backing or wealth from ill-gotten assets, those of us with firm democratic ideals must have the courage to fight to the finish.
Michelle Wang is the deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Angela Hong
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS