Taiwan's trade surplus this year reached US$25.1 billion by last month. Yet behind this record figure lie some very worrying facts: The proportion of orders made to Taiwanese companies with factories abroad rose from 45.64 percent in April to 47.39 percent in October. These firm's revenues are one-third larger than that of wholly domestic firms, and the number of foreign workers has reached an average of 67 percent of overseas companies' total employees.
Even so, Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
In reality, judging by the figures above, it has not caused Taiwanese companies to lag behind foreign competitors in terms of utilizing manufacturing resources in China. Furthermore, profits have risen by 22 percent for Taiwanese businesses -- ahead of Hong Kong at 14.4 percent, Japan at 12.9 percent, and South Korea, which Ma and his running mate Vincent Siew (
In other words, our competitive edge is not disappearing without the three links. Taiwan should be worried about the decline in domestic industries -- not about the limitations to economic growth as a result of trade regulations.
For the same reasons, Ma and Hsieh's main demand to further open up cross-strait trade has drawn heavy criticism, as this strategy may turn Taiwan into another Hong Kong.
In any case, Taiwanese industries are already developing a new trend.
According to the Ministry of Finance, Taiwan's exports to Hong Kong and China from January to last month rose by 11.7 percent compared with the same period in the previous year.
Yet the same figures rose by 64.4 percent for exports to India, and 14.4 percent to ASEAN nations, of which exports to Vietnam rose by 60 percent last month.
As is the case with China, this trend was led by investment.
Because of taxation, labor and other regulation changes in China, the cost of manufacturing is rising quickly. While Ma and Hsieh eagerly pave the road to China for Taiwanese businesses, the businesses themselves are migrating out of China in droves. Starting from the Dongguan area in Guangdong, major electronics companies such as Hon Hai Technology Group and Compal Electronics Inc are planning factories in Vietnam. Compal envisions a factory there on the same scale as its facility in Kunshan, China.
Taiwan has been Vietnam's largest source of foreign investment for a while, but now the level of investment is growing even more rapidly -- so much so that it is almost a revival of the failed "go south" policy promoted by former president Lee Teng-hui (
Southward investment can balance the problem of increasing China-bound investments, which is of course good news. So should the government encourage investment in Southeast Asia?
Former presidential adviser Huang Tien-lin (黃天麟) brushed aside concerns, but perhaps too quickly. In trade between Vietnam and Taiwan, there is no three links issue and no question of compromising national security. But would it really be beneficial if Vietnam absorbed all of Taiwan's manufacturing industries? Down-stream industries in particular, which would see rising unemployment, are no longer being absorbed into China. The rapidly growing domestic market in China is no longer the cause of closing factories, unemployment and declining industries in Taiwan. If Taiwan were to invade the Chinese domestic market, should the government impose regulations?
In the past, the government promoted southward-bound ventures, but industries moved west. Now, firms are ignoring westward policies and going south.
Internal forces drive structural economics and the effects of governmental policies on the economy are limited. The point of cross-strait trade, which pan-blue and pan-green parties have debated endlessly, is slowly losing focus because of this.
The key to the future of Taiwan's industries is whether they can develop toward high-level manufacturing, increased innovation and effective branding. It is not a question of cross-strait regulations.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Angela Hong
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath