THE DAY BEFORE the inscription dazhong zhizheng (大中至正) was taken down from the main gate at the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall, an ETTV cameraman was run over by a truck. The whole country could see on the news how the cameraman was dragged in under the truck, while his colleagues cried as they filmed and photographed the incident. This shows the danger that journalists face, and how they are often torn between humanitarian and professional ethics. It's very distressing. But off-screen lurks a tragic reality.
Reading each of the four major national newspapers on Dec. 8, three of them had a picture of the terrible scene and the badly injured cameraman on the front page. Such stark news images being violently pushed by the media is precisely what the French post-modernist Jean Baudrillard mentioned in his writings: It was a sensational pleasure derived from images, just like the case of the dead in the mass grave in Timisoara in Romania.
The brave and professional actions of a cameraman on the front lines was treated in the same fashion as the bloody, sensational images produced when crocodile bit off the arm of a veterinarian at a zoo in Kaohsiung. Tragedies and serious accidents like this are hard to bear for a responsible news industry.
Upon opening newspapers, we were stunned to see that they published strong denouncements of this violent incident inside. Seeing this misplaced hypocrisy, we can't help asking whether the media outlets that use media violence and write up the misfortunes of a fellow journalist are really qualified to denounce the troublemakers who instigated this accident.
If they really want to denounce someone, why don't they look into the background of the troublemakers, or thoroughly investigate the motives behind the accident? Isn't faithfully reporting the actual state of affairs the most important work that people in the news industry do?
Going back to the TV news of the cameraman's accident, even though some channels pixilated the footage of the injured man, the public had to witness yet again how some channels sensationalized this tragic incident to obscure the core facts.
First, they intentionally misled viewers by proclaiming on their news scrollers that the truck driver had a pan-green background -- without checking to see if this was true.
Second, when it became clear that the driver was assisting the campaign of a pro-unification politician, some channels tried to obscure the facts by saying on their scrollers that the driver had a record of attacking Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) -- omitting the fact that the reasons for those attacks was that the driver believed Ma was not pro-unification enough.
This coverage was a textbook case of using selective exposure to hide the facts. Does this do justice to the professionalism of a cameraman who took serious risks to film a news event?
The top managers who ordered that news should be reported in this manner should be ashamed of themselves considering the risks their frontline workers face.
Lillian Wang is an associate professor of journalism at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with