For more than a decade, Taiwanese have been calling for political groups to pull out of the media. Despite the fact that, back in 2003, amendments to the Radio and Television Act (
The inability of political parties and media outlets to disassociate themselves from each other deserves a reprimand.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai's (
Looking back, since Taiwan allowed the opening of the fourth wireless TV station in 1994, followed by cable and satellite TV, the quantity of TV channels has increased substantially.
But the media do not represent the full spectrum of political views. Rather, everything is either green or blue. In the wireless TV market, the chairman of FTV also happened to be a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator. CTV shares, meanwhile, were reluctantly transferred from the KMT to a pro-KMT newspaper owner, resulting in a cross-media conglomerate with complete disregard for regulations.
In satellite TV, various news channels have allied themselves with political parties and have served as enthusiastic cheerleaders for everything from internal party elections, presidential elections, important legal cases and public demonstrations.
The law clearly states that parties and politicians are not allowed to invest in or operate media outlets. But that is only at the most basic level. Politics and media are still making passes at one another. Not only should politicians not interfere with the media, but the media should also know its own limits.
While the media reforms engendered a great deal of interest, the supposedly freer media have become increasingly partisan. This is not only the result of the ideology of the owners and managers in charge of media corporations, but also commercial considerations.
No wonder former Eastern Broadcasting Co chairman Gary Wang (
TV stations are still stuck in the morass of pan-blue and pan-green affiliations. This threatens to undermine the freedoms that democratization has brought and skirts the media's responsibility to serve as the public conscience.
Many people who are well informed on the situation have run out of patience and have tried to give rise to a third force.
The media should show self-restraint, as should parties and politicians. Taiwan already forbids political forces to interfere with the media or public education. If parties and politicians are concerned with the development of the media, then in the lead-up to the elections they should make a commitment to fashion an environment that favors reasonable control over commercial TV channels and grant public channels sufficient resources to successfully develop without the need to rely on political parties.
The public and commercial media outlets must be allowed to compete over quality and the media industry should accept its social responsibilities. For their part, politicians should be prevented at all costs from meddling in the media for short-term gain.
Hung Chen-ling is an assistant professor at National Taiwan University's Graduate Institute of Journalism.
Translated by Angela Hong and Anna Stiggelbout
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with