Every day the news is filled with reports on international concern about Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's purported departure from democracy, about his declaration of emergency powers, about ignoring court orders and proceedings, arrests of dissidents, about the need for free and fair elections. The tenor of the relentless reporting is about how awful it is for Pakistan to be subjected to autocratic rule and how absolutely necessary it is for Pakistan to allow democratic mechanisms.
But I don't want to focus on Pakistan. It is not the dabbling in democracy there I am curious about, but more about the endless weeping and wailing in the press about the apparent loss of democracy, so many calls for the reversal of emergency powers and a return to elections and the restoration of democracy in Pakistan, and also Myanmar. But to me, it sounds like so much hypocrisy. Why hypocritical?
It is hypocritical simply because these same news organizations and Western governments do not have the same urgency about democracy in China, the worst dictatorship in the world.
Why are there no fervent calls for imposition of democratic elections in China? Why are there no urgent demands for establishment of an independent judiciary in China? Why are there no protests around the world calling for the president in China to be freely and fairly elected? Some human rights organizations talk about it, but not with the same fervor.
Why is it easy to vehemently complain about Pakistan and Myanmar in loud and determined voices, but not about China, when the situation in China is far worse than in Pakistan and for more than 10 times as many people?
That is the definition of hypocrisy. It is easy -- and apparently attractive -- to throw stones at Pakistan, especially since it is friendly to the US. China, on the other hand, wields enormous economic power, its ability to blackmail anyone, anywhere, at any time, is legend, and it is willing to defy the West on all accounts and particularly on those -- like preventing genocide in Sudan or restraining a nuclear Iran -- which involve having a conscience. The disparity in treatment is both astonishing and abhorrent.
Hypocrisy at its worst.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with