Several domestic media outlets have recently broadcast news of individuals publicly provoking President Chen Shui-bian (
Such news aims to tell the public that while the local economy is on the verge of a recession, the government prefers to ignore the problem.
Most people may be happy to see the media showing "concern for people's standard of living and bad political decisions."
However, after indignant and critical reports about the economic crisis and the government's failure to sympathize with public hardships while the economy "stagnates," there was a news story about a well-known department store celebrating its anniversary.
News anchors put away their serious demeanor and happily reported how the department store was packed with customers and how its owner vowed to bring in more than NT$5.6 billion (US$170 million) in revenues within a few days.
In order to convince viewers, the news also broadcast footage of customers falling over one another at the store, leading to confusion as to whether Taiwan is suffering economically or if its purchasing power is growing.
Some may argue that this coverage is a result of calls for balanced news coverage. But if the news is supposed to be balanced, then news anchors should only report the facts without adding unnecessary critical opinions about politics or use promotional language that should only be seen in advertisements.
One minute the public is is treated to a show of how Taiwan is indeed in a difficult economic situation and the government doesn't care. The next minute it is told that Taiwan's economic power is growing, which would seemingly endorse Chen's statement that it is strange that "those who claim not to be able to survive economically still find time to attend exhibitions."
Are TV stations suffering from mental confusion?
These more or less contradictory news reports are the consequence of the interference of external forces in the media. Because of political interference, media outlets have become the mouthpieces of political organizations. And because of financial incentives, they are now in the marketing business.
In other words, these news media don't really care about the "suffering public" and fail to look into the real social problems. Frankly speaking, their only concern is their own interests -- the bottom line.
So how are these media organizations qualified to criticize other people?
It is true that Taiwan is experiencing an economic slowdown, but is it a global problem or merely caused by a single "terrible party?"
Are soaring commodity prices the result of an imbalance between supply and demand or caused by human factors?
Crude oil prices have climbed nearly 300 percent since 2000, causing other costs to follow.
The state-controlled CPC Corp, Taiwan, however, has only increased its per-liter gas price to slightly more than NT$30 and is still able to maintain its budget of "legal surplus."
How it is that while many people are complaining about not being able to maintain their businesses, some stores can sell their products at record-low prices?
How can some red-bean pancake store owners make millions of dollars a year despite soaring vegetable prices?
Why do vegetable farmers complain that they don't make any profits at all?
All these issues have confused viewers, and this is what the news media really should look into.
In a word, the news media should stay professional and broadcast in-depth and quality stories. They should not let political and financial interference keep the public from getting the news they deserve.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor in the Department of Chinese at National Dong Hua University
Translated by Ted Yang
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS