Near the St. Peter's Church in Leiden in the Netherlands there is a "historical spot" that is an ancient execution ground. A plate there shows an execution scene. A judge is overseeing the execution, and the executioner is lifting his axe, about to behead the convict. The scene is very similar to executions in ancient China and elsewhere.
There is also a Spanish picture of a mass execution of Protestants in the 16th century. It showed a harrowing scene: In the foreground were people who had been beheaded, while a group of people further away had been hanged. At the right were religious leaders ordering the army to arrest a group of people. It was clear they were to continue the punishments. This picture shows how cruel and vicious state-sanctioned killing is.
At the side of a pond near the Dutch Parliament in The Hague stands a statue of Johan van Oldebarnevelt. Van Oldebarnevelt was an important figure in the establishment of the Dutch Republic.
This man is very interesting because for almost 30 years he facilitated talks between the various Dutch provinces to help establish the Netherlands as a sovereign country, thus making an important contribution to the establishment of the Dutch Republic.
He was also an important player in the establishment of the Dutch East India Company (VOC), but in 1619 he was sentenced to death for the crime of high treason.
Van Oldebarnevelt's death was the result of a conflict that was both political and religious. He was rather tolerant when it came to religion, but was killed because he was not tolerant enough.
Seeing his statue in The Hague makes people feel that in the end, finally he has received some sort of justice. But it is still difficult to understand how someone who was so important in establishing the Netherlands as a sovereign country could have been sentenced to death by the same government he helped create.
During World War II, the Netherlands was occupied by Germany and many Dutch were killed. After the war, the death penalty -- which had been abolished in 1870 -- was temporarily reinstated especially to punish people who had collaborated with the German invaders, and thousands or people were arrested.
Of the 152 people that were sentenced to death, only 39 were actually executed as Queen Juliana pardoned many of the convicts.
The unfair killing of an old politician like van Oldebarnevelt was officially sanctioned by the state and the people who were sentenced to death for betraying their country during the war were a final example of the Netherland's sanctioned killing.
Especially after World War II, when the help these people had given to the Nazis resulted in the death of so many of their compatriots, it makes sense that the state wanted to kill them in accordance with the law.
The Netherlands is just one example of country with a history of state-sanctioned killing which has created untold bitterness and pain in the country. All countries in the EU have a similar history of such cruelty and inhumanity.
With such a historical background, we should pay attention to an EU representative who last month called on Taiwan to abolish its death penalty.
The UN has also passed a resolution calling on all countries to do so. As Taiwan is actively trying to join the UN, it should move in accordance with the UN and abolish the death penalty.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor at Leiden University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS