Educated in the US and fluent in four languages and the values of free-market democracies, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili was supposed to be different.
When he was elected president of Georgia after a bloodless revolution in 2003, he was deemed a savior for the post-Soviet landscape, as if he had been conjured by a committee of Washington think tanks and European human rights groups.
Yet this week, with Georgia under a state of emergency after his government quashed a large demonstration and violently shut an opposition television station, Saakashvili seemed, even in the eyes of some steadfast supporters, to be ruling with the willfulness of the very autocrats that he once so disdained. Was his true temperament showing, or had the burdens and realities of office somehow changed him?
Georgia has in recent years taken on a prominence far greater than its small size would merit, in large part because under Saakashvili, it had been considered a model for countries trying to shed decades of despotism and decay.
Now, Saakashvili has begun to draw comparisons to a leader who has chosen a different path to lift his nation: President Vladimir Putin of Russia, Georgia's neighbor, former overlord and these days frequent adversary. The Georgian government's announcement on Wednesday that it would cancel the state of emergency two days later appeared unlikely to wipe away the stain on the reputation of Saakashvili, who is only 39 and is known as Misha.
"I think that Misha tends toward the authoritarian," said Scott Horton, a human rights lawyer in the US who taught Saakashvili when he was a student at Columbia Law School in the mid-1990s, later hired him at a law firm in New York and has remained friendly with him.
"I would put it this way: There is a remarkable similarity between Misha and Putin in terms of their attitudes about presidential prerogatives and authority," he said.
Like Putin, he said, Saakashvili has marginalized the parliament and taken to belittling the opposition.
Horton said he did not believe that Georgia -- a former Soviet republic that lies in the Caucasus at the crossroads of Europe and Asia -- was turning into a dictatorship or that Saakashvili was as harsh as Putin.
Still, in Tbilisi and in the West, the question that was being debated among Saakashvili's allies was whether he had become another strongman in a region full of them.
Matthew Bryza, a senior US diplomat who was here this week to try to persuade Saakashvili to lift the state of emergency, told reporters that he was sympathetic to the pressures that Saakashvili had to bear.
But Bryza then went on to say that Saakashvili's closing of the opposition television station "sent shock waves" through Washington.
Washington had been a place where Saakashvili had thrived in recent years, becoming a regular on the policy speech circuit and in the halls of government. He was so popular among officials who wanted to hear of his successes -- the fight against corruption, the strong economic growth, the judicial reform -- that he joked he could turn more heads walking through Congress than Britney Spears.
In recent days, with characteristic brashness, Saakashvili has lashed back, contending that a fragile Georgian democracy was severely threatened by the opposition protests, that Russia was trying to destabilize the country and that the television station was advocating the overthrow of the government. The station, Imedi, remains closed, and officials said on Wednesday that a court had pulled its license, responding to a request by prosecutors.
The president noted that soon after he declared the state of emergency, he also called for early presidential elections in January, thereby ensuring that the opposition would have a chance to make its case.
"Before anyone starts discussing which eccentric, authoritarian or, what is more, dictatorial ruler the Georgian president resembles, I would like to remind you that I am the president of Georgia who is reducing his own first presidential term of his own free will," he said in a speech to the nation.
"And I am resorting to what is unprecedented in our region and in most of the world's countries," he said.
Saakashvili's advisers said it was unfair to lob criticism from the West, where politicians and journalists of all stripes generally understood the importance of acting within certain boundaries to preserve democracy. In this rough part of the word, they said, political dirty tricks and intrigue are the norm (Saakashvili has said the opposition has accused him of everything from murders to "nearly eating babies").
What is more, the advisers said, even as the government faces an irresponsible opposition, it is also grappling with two separatist regions on the Russian border that are receiving aid from Moscow and are always on the brink of stoking a full-blown armed conflict.
"It is more easy to see things in a stereotype way," said Giga Bokeria, a member of parliament and a close ally of the president.
"Here is the president, he didn't like the demonstration, he cracked down, he closed the television stations he didn't like. That is the end of democracy. This is the comfortable position, but it is not the truth,"Bokeria said.
The opposition says Saakashvili has duped Georgians and Westerners into believing he was a democrat. Salome Zourabichvili, a former foreign minister in Saakashvili's government who has become an opposition leader, said Saakashvili was intolerant of criticism and unwilling to share power.
"Their attitude is, `We are the majority and hence we know what are the good decisions, and we don't have to explain our decisions,'" she said.
"This is a very Bolshevik attitude of the mind. I am not saying that we are living in a Bolshevik country, but that is a mindset that is the old style and not the democratic way of looking at things," she said.
"At least everybody knows what Putin is and nobody is mistaken about Putin," she said.
But Bokeria called such views absurd.
"From a distance, with all of the propaganda machines against us, it looks very bad," he said. "And it takes time to understand the sequence of events, the dynamic. But he is the same democrat as he was."
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS