Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang (
Yahoo is not the only foreign company that has been forced to comply with communist China's autocratic regime. In June of 2004, China forbade all Internet businesses from creating or disseminating any superstitious, pornographic, or "harmful" material to China and its people.
Accordingly, Google was forced to design a set of software that filters Web pages containing sensitive terms such as "Taiwanese independence," "democracy," "Tiananmen Square massacre," "Falun Gong" and others.
The example of Yahoo and Google should remind the Taiwanese public of the relationship between state autonomy, social security and the suggestion made by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
On March 14, 2005, Beijing passed the "Anti-Secession" Law of which Article 8 states that China shall use non-peaceful and any other necessary means to deal with Taiwanese separatist forces. China will not allow Taiwan to declare itself an independent, sovereign state.
The DPP purports to be a pan-green, grassroots party seeking sovereignty and independence, and should thus realize the threat to national and economic security posed by the migration of industry to China.
Annexation through economic means is China's primary tactic against Taiwan. The purpose of forming the Association of Taiwan Investment Enterprise on the Mainland (台企聯) in April from numerous Taiwanese enterprises -- with officials from China's Taiwan Affairs Office (國台辦) as honorary chairman and vice president of the standing committee -- is to ensure that the association issues commands that are directed by the Chinese government.
Beijing has yet to deploy the ultimate weapon of unification through economic means because the time is not yet ripe: Taiwan's large corporations, limited by the 40 percent cap on China-bound investments, still retain 60 percent of their assets in Taiwan.
If China shows its cards too early, they will choose Taiwan in order to preserve the bulk of their assets. China has attempted to eliminate this problem by using Taiwanese businesses, pro-unification academics and media outlets and other external sources to argue for the removal of the cap. It appears that the government will buckle under pressure from businesses as China had hoped.
After the investment cap is lifted, Taiwan's large, publicly traded companies will quickly invest more than 50 percent of their assets in China, whereupon they will turn their backs on Taiwan, conform to China's unification goals, and the union of the motherland will "mature naturally."
This article will not even address the more serious repercussions for Taiwan's economy.
Thus, the 40 percent investment cap should be considered in the light of state sovereignty, economic security and risk management, rather than as a problem concerning individual corporations or businesses. The Financial Holding Company Act (金控法) stipulates that investment in non-financial enterprises by finance holding companies cannot exceed 15 percent of its paid-up capital, just as the Banking Act (銀行法) stipulates that a bank may not extend more than 15 percent of its net value in credit to a party or group of companies for the purpose of financial security and risk management. The rules do not vary according to industry and are not a matter of "assessment on individual basis."
If the financial holding company and banking acts are unfair and unreasonable, would implementing project assessment on an individual basis make things fair and reasonable? In reality, individual assessment is merely a smoke screen used by officials and businesses wishing to avoid the cap.
How can we not admire the US Congress for holding a hearing for Yahoo's "moral pygmies" and chastising their behavior. Hopefully, our politicians will be inspired by the incident.
Taiwan is already the most invested country in China, accounting for half of all of China's foreign direct investment. Is 40 percent too restrictive? Look at the world's other businesses: Samsung, Toyota, General Motors or the above-mentioned Yahoo and Google -- which one invests more than 20 percent of its net worth in China?
China is a country that seeks to annex Taiwan. Should we not be concerned with state and economic security? If the DPP is truly a grassroots movement, please put a stop to things before it is too late.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Angela Hong
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS