Being lectured by a two-time presidential election loser is hardly an intimidating prospect, unless that person holds an honorary title in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and his audience is the KMT faithful.
Former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
He should know.
Lien made the remarks after learning that the party's highest decision-making body, the Central Standing Committee, on Wednesday agreed to delete the Guidelines for National Unification and the fictional "1992 consensus" from the party's mission statement for next year.
It would have been most creditable if the KMT had let go of its fantasy of unification and followed mainstream opinion backing Taiwan as a sovereign entity.
However, just as it seemed the party was really doing this -- in the hours after the United Daily News story hit the stands -- the KMT flatly denied that it had changed its cross-strait policy.
Instead, KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma said that the KMT's annual mission statement was less important than the party charter and guidelines, both of which enshrine the goal of unification with China.
KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (
As Ma pointed out, this fuss is over an annual mission statement.
Just because the terms were taken out of the statement does not mean that they cannot be reinstated, nor does it mean that they do not inform KMT policy and strategy.
Wu then made some intriguing remarks to a group of veterans on Wednesday as he called on deep-blue supporters to show understanding for Ma: "Some things that [Ma] said may not be in sync with our highest standards ... but so long as he is elected, all the things that worry you will disappear."
If all this is indeed an election ploy aimed at pan-green votes, then the KMT might do well to heed Lien's words.
On Thursday Lien went on to say that the KMT would be wrong to think that scrapping these elements from its mission statement would allow it to claw more votes away from the pan-green camp.
Lien may have lost two presidential campaigns, but he might have finally come to know a thing or two about voters.
Besides, if Taiwanese are so easily fooled, Lien would have sealed a 2004 election victory after prostrating himself and kissing the ground to demonstrate his love for the nation in front of the Presidential Office.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with