At the opening of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) National Congress, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The problem with Beijing's new PR blitz is that it is stuck in the realm of Beijing's old "united front" effort for "unification."
These words nonetheless succinctly defined Beijing's misrepresentation of problems between Taiwan and China.
"A formal end to the state of hostility between the two sides" isn't really necessary given that Taiwan and Taiwanese haven't contemplated any hostile acts against China. Hundreds of billions of dollars in Taiwanese investment in China so far can attest to this fact.
If there is any "state of hostility," it's unilateral, as evinced by nearly 1,000 missiles targeting Taiwan and a myriad of threats not the least of which is the enactment of the "Anti-secession" Law. As soon as Beijing formally removes them, the hostility can "end."
Historically, "the two sides" to which Hu referred mean the CCP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Millions died in clashes between the two for the control of China before the KMT was defeated and fled to Taiwan.
The hostility formally ended in 2005 when former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Nowadays, the CCP and the KMT embrace each other with no want of exchanges, dialogue and consultations and negotiations in their concerted effort to undermine Taiwanese society for the ultimate goal of "unifying" Taiwan with China.
The "hostility" is therefore nothing but a fabrication by Beijing to justify its belligerence.
Under the prerequisite that the party "recognizes that both sides of the strait belong to one China," "any political party in Taiwan" referenced in Hu's statement could only mean the KMT. If Hu were referring to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the condition would make his proposal dead on arrival as a statement to the contrary is etched in the DPP charter.
While the prerequisite implies that Beijing has no interest talking to anyone who isn't ready to relinquish Taiwan to China, to call a statement like this a peace overture is ludicrous.
Although "the two sides" might not have bilateral animosity, Beijing does have an axe to grind regarding Taiwan's use of the Republic of China (ROC) name.
The original ROC died when the People's Republic of China (PRC) was created in 1949. The present ROC is a shell created by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and forced on the Taiwanese people soon after his arrival in Taiwan. Chiang at the time wielded this re-minted ROC as "legitimacy" for the KMT's brutal rule lest the KMT be regarded as just a vanquished armed band from China.
It should be further noted that after the PRC replaced the ROC in China, Chiang's use of the word "China" in his ROC was an act of identity theft. For geopolitical consideration during the Korean War and the Vietnam War, the West entertained Chiang's folly for more than two decades before China gained a UN seat in 1971. The US ended Chiang's masquerade in 1979 when it severed formal relations with the ROC.
Even though China has a legitimate grievance with the ROC shell any attempt to expand the complaint into a claim on Taiwan and the Taiwanese people, whose biggest "crime" might be their meek harboring of a looted identity, would still be more than preposterous. The fact remains that Beijing vehemently objects to Taiwan's discard of the shell lest "justification" for China's taking of Taiwan be diminished.
That could only give Taiwanese more reasons not to keep the ROC any longer than necessary. Shedding the moniker deserves to be looked upon as an urgent national security matter that can't afford procrastination.
Although aggression needs no excuse, getting rid of even the flimsiest subterfuge would expose Beijing as the pure aggressor it is, the poisoned olive branch currently on display notwithstanding.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS