Herbert Hanreich totally neglected the important issue of Teachers' Day, that is, for Taiwan's teachers to rethink their mission ("Modern confusions over Confucius," Sept. 28, page 8).
Let's look at how Teachers' Day is celebrated: Does any student still care about his teachers? Dear teacher, did you receive a card or any letter from your students? I guess the most likely answer is "no." Why?
Obviously students want to assert their own free will and move past what they perceive to be an authoritarian-style education. Their clothing and hair styles reflect their desire to drop old traditions. Some skip classes, others make inappropriate noises in class -- both reveal a strong desire to break down the old rules.
Hanreich, talking about Taiwanese teachers' behavior, emphasized that Socrates' teaching methods would be more appropriate to Taiwanese students than Confucius'.
His main purpose is probably to criticize the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People's Republic of China because they have used Confucius to rationalize their authority. It is not the first time that ancient philosophers or artists have been misused and manipulated by dictatorships and totalitarian regimes: We've seen plenty of examples in human history. But it does not mean that Confucius is wrong because he advocates public obedience and Socrates is right because he praises public self- awareness.
One of the original purposes of Teachers' Day is connected with the important role of intellectuals, especially those who teach, in society. Perhaps, during the emergence of a dictatorial regime, teachers become its most reliable watchdogs.
But Taiwan is a democracy now. Teachers can enjoy freedom of expression. They are no longer forced to devote themselves to a dictatorship and its ideologies. Therefore, teachers should rethink both their goals and methods to get along with young students.
Young people are always in search of a new identity and a new way of life. When establishing a new identity, students are often infatuated with their own image. Cooperating with other students, not to mention teachers, is not a priority. This is why teachers must not only encourage students to express their own opinions and feelings, but also to teach them to respect their classmates and understand others' opinions and feelings.
Young students have a tendency to lose patience when listening to their classmates' oral reports because they think the reports are boring. Should the teacher impose discipline as Confucius said, or should he or she use Socratic irony to expose their ignorance and push them to listen to the report?
No matter what choice the teacher makes, he or she would succeed in only temporarily controlling the students' behavior, not in changing their core values and attitude.
It would be more interesting for the teacher to use humor to reduce tensions and make them smile. This may also help students to have a positive outlook and unconsciously change their attitudes.
Society is always changing, so a teacher must change as well. Whether it's Teachers' Day or not, teachers must reevaluate their mission every year. They should rethink their mission, focus on inculcating the appropriate values and attitude by educating students in the moral virtues, building up their intellectual and physical capabilities, promoting social cooperation and developing an appreciation for aesthetics.
Teachers must continually improve their abilities; otherwise, they are incapable of accomplishing this mission.
Sylvie Allassonniere
Taipei
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength