US Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Thomas Christensen, in a speech before the US-Taiwan Business Council Defense Industry Conference on Sept. 11, urged Taiwan to be prepared to defend itself against a Chinese attack at least long enough for US forces to arrive.
This urgent tone should not be taken lightly given the backdrop: China has been reported to have added one missile a week targeting Taiwan for some time. Needless to say, this presents a serious challenge for planners responsible for Taiwan's security.
That Taiwan is so close to China is a fact that no one can change. However, what can change is the early warning capability in detecting Chinese missiles in their low-speed ascending phase.
Several platforms using different technologies and carriers are capable of providing an early warning. The first device is a space-based satellite, either equator-geosynchronous or polar-orbiting.
The second is an airborne platform -- an aircraft or balloon equipped with downward-looking surveillance radar.
The third is a land-based installation of over-the-horizon radar equipment.
The fourth is a sea-based vessel with, for instance, Aegis systems.
For Taiwan, none of the platforms is within production capability. Instead, it depends on foreign sources, in particular the US, for urgently needed detection capabilities.
Meanwhile, other issues such as budget, procurement lead times, crew recruitment and crew training are equally pressing.
What should Taiwan's priority be?
The space-based satellite device is considered the best, but is expensive and most likely not something Taiwan can afford, manage or operate.
The airborne platform offers similar performance to the space-based platform, but it is deficient in terms of endurance and operating crew.
The land-based platform is less favorable because it lacks line-of-sight detection capabilities and, being a stationary target, is vulnerable in an environment of electronic warfare.
The sea-based vessel is the last option. Reported to cost up to US$1 billion and needing more than half a decade to build, Taiwan would need to complete a purchase as soon as possible.
While the budget can be spread over many years, crew recruitment and training, which also takes a few years, must commence immediately so that there is no additional delay.
A second layer of protection also deserves critical evaluation. While the first layer focuses on detection, the second layer aims at effective interception and eventually disabling or destroying incoming projectiles by indirect electronic countermeasures or direct impact.
Taiwan must act, and act soon.
Kengchi Goah is a research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS