The failure of Taiwan and China to reach a compromise on the passage of the Olympic torch through Taiwan comes as an anti-climax.
This is because it was a foregone conclusion: The concessions Beijing required -- no displays of offensive national symbols -- were always going to be intolerable, even allowing for the pragmatism that accompanies sporting events.
This decision now takes away attention from Taiwan's identity problems and symbolic lines in the sand. And perhaps this is just as well, because the genuine focus for activists and governments of conscience everywhere is surely not Taiwan's beef with China and whether Taiwan should launch a boycott -- notwithstanding the 1,000 or so missiles pointing in our direction and regular verbal threats -- but the ritual mistreatment of Chinese nationals by their own government.
The issue of a boycott, indeed, will take a back seat as the government focuses on more pressing issues, such as re-election.
It is unlikely that Democratic Progressive Party legislators hostile to Olympic participation and their think tank colleagues will make much of an impact on public thinking for the moment. There simply isn't enough interest in the subject.
So, over to you, Mia Farrow and like-minded activists, to prick the consciences of those around the world who still have one.
This will be a big ask, because the International Olympic Committee (IOC), indifferent governments, hypocrisy-peddling national Olympic committees and sports fans with no conscience are a formidable bunch laid end to end.
But optimists should note that the Chinese government, in all its squalor, is an inadvertent friend. Unable to adapt to international sensibilities, unwilling to sincerely engage with its foes and unfailing in its refusal to show contrition for its mistakes -- past and present -- Beijing will bite at every bait that activists throw at it.
The Chinese are entitled to a feeling of pride at hosting the Games, but they are not entitled to whitewash the cruelty that their governments routinely inflict on the weakest of the citizenry -- and the reality that the Games are a principal propaganda tool for those who would continue to do so.
We look forward to the Games for this reason, and this reason only: Every display of outrage at Chinese brutality, every word of dissent and every humanitarian protest -- by local or foreigner -- will be conflated with hooliganism, separatism, splittism, terrorism and any other "ism" that comes to the mind of Beijing's propaganda squad.
The violent results will be a thick smear on the already sleazy record of the IOC and a sober illustration of the profound ugliness of the new Chinese nationalism.
And the violence will come as a rude shock for those who persist with the fantasy that China is a benevolent culture whose time for pre-eminence has returned. The slogan "genocide games" and likening Beijing 2008 to Berlin 1936 may strike some as a little theatrical, but this may be because the world has not been given a proper theater to understand China's modern nature. Until now.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with