In the early days, the role of the Council of Grand Justices was not given much importance. Over time, their role has changed, beginning with Constitutional Interpretation No. 261 issued on June 21, 1990, which resulted in the re-election of the entire legislature and Taiwan's democratization.
Following that, laws violating individual freedom, the freedom of speech and the principle of gender equality were declared unconstitutional in interpretations by the council, and from that time on, the grand justices have played an important role as guarantors of human rights.
In recent years, the opposition between the pan-green and pan-blue camps and their different views of constitutional politics have resulted in clashes between the government and the legislature. These clashes include the conflicts surrounding the National Communications Commission (NCC), the 319 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Commission and the legislature's right to approve presidential nominations to the Control Yuan. This shows that the grand justices now play a decisive role as guarantors of human rights and in the development of the framework for constitutional politics.
Grand justices are appointed for a period of eight years and cannot be reappointed. Half of them are replaced every four years. The purpose of this design is that a longer term and a ban on reappointments will lead to an independent council free from political intervention. The rule that half of the council shall be replaced every four years allows every president the opportunity to appoint Grand Justices.
Some people now voice concerns because if the current eight nominees are all approved, all grand justices for the next presidential term will have been appointed by the same president. This, however, is a result of the system. This kind of situation does not occur in the US because Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, and the president will only have the opportunity to appoint a Supreme Court justice if an incumbent passes away or resigns. This is very different from our system.
As a reflection of the importance of the grand justices, six non-governmental organizations -- the Taipei Society, the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, the Taiwan Law Society, the Taipei Bar Association and the Taiwan Bar Association -- have formed an alliance for the non-governmental supervision of the nominees to the Council of Grand Justices and the Judicial Yuan's president and vice president. Following the president's nominations, the alliance formed a review committee that has interviewed and investigated the nominees and evaluated their moral integrity, academic ability, professional performance, constitutional understanding and human rights ideals. The results will be announced in a report issued in the next few days.
In addition, the alliance has also designed a set of questions related to the duties of the grand justices and submitted it to legislators as a reference for their question and answer session. Finally, the alliance will also form an observation team that will review how the legislature performs its right of approval during the legislative review process.
Finally, I want to call on the legislature to quickly conduct their review of the nominees. We nurture a sincere hope that the legislative review will focus on the nominees' human rights ideals, constitutional understanding and insistence on judicial reform rather than on pan-green and pan-blue ideology or resorting to verbal abuse and personal attacks.
Hawang Shiow-duan is chair of the Taipei Society and political science professor at Soochow University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past