The US president praised Taiwan as an example of democratic development and as a leading US defense partner ("Bush lauds Taiwan's democratic society," Sept. 8, page 1) at the recent APEC meeting.
The Taiwanese must have mixed feelings about Bush's praise.
They are happy because their democratization efforts and Taiwan's defense partnership have been recognized.
But they also feel sad because the US, under its outdated policy and China's influence, has penalized them in many areas for several decades. They prefer praise followed by reward.
Taiwan is one of the major economic powers in the Asia-Pacific region, but Taiwan's democratically elected president cannot attend the APEC meetings.
In the last two years, presidents of two private companies represented Taiwan at the APEC meetings and their nominations were subject to China's approval. Taiwan was mislabeled as "Chinese Taipei" and was not invited to some important APEC committee meetings.
In the US, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was banned from entering the lower 48 states for a stopover en route to Central America. He chose to stay aboard his plane in Alaska as a form of silent protest. There have been no top-level meetings between the US and Taiwan.
It is reported that Taiwanese representative to the US Joseph Wu (吳釗變) can meet US officials only in their "nonofficial capacities" in restaurants rather than at the State Department.
The US rejects Chen's proposed referendum on entering the UN, as well as name rectification and normalization of the nation.
Recently, a US official declared that Taiwan was not a country.
But he failed to propose a referendum for Taiwanese to decide their national status according to the UN principle of self-determination.
Charles Hong
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Last year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) turned the Double Ten National Day ceremony into a platform for grievances against the government. Yesterday, standing before the president and foreign dignitaries, he warned against Taiwan becoming a “false democracy, in reality a dictatorship.” Then he called for unity. Democratic leaders must tolerate criticism, even on ceremonial occasions, but Han misused his position and a national celebration to insinuate that Taiwan’s elected president was steering the country toward dictatorship and cast himself as a statesman offering reconciliation. Han asked how Taiwan’s security should be examined, using a medical analogy. If he insists on playing
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
RSS