When the presidents of the world's remaining superpower and the nation fast challenging for the title, US President George Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), met in Sydney on Thursday they were to discuss trade and global warming.
However, even if not on the formal agenda, both sides were likely to be considering the prickly issue of cyber warfare, following the revelation that the Pentagon suffered a major breach by hackers reportedly working for the Chinese military earlier this year.
Disclosure by the Financial Times that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) assaulted part of the Pentagon's system used by policy advisers to US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is the latest and potentially most serious breach, and it set alarm bells ringing across the US military.
The Defense Department reportedly resisted the PLA onslaught for several months, but was finally penetrated, forcing a shutdown of that part of its network for a week.
A spokesman would not comment on the assault or its source, but emphasized that any information obtained would have been unclassified. The timing of the attack, and the apparent involvement of the PLA, points to an escalation of anxiety in governments across the world.
Cyber warfare began with individuals, spread to criminal gangs, and is now reaching the realm of nation states.
The Chinese government denied the allegations, but the presidential meeting aside, Beijing is already on the defensive over its cyber activities. Last week German Chancellor Angela Merkel raised the issue of cyber warfare on an official visit to China, exhorting the government to "respect a set of game rules."
Her objections followed a report in Der Spiegel magazine that Chinese spying software had been found widely scattered through the networks of Germany's foreign and economic departments, and even in Merkel's private office.
Internet security experts have been tracking Chinese cyber warfare for several years. In 2005, US officials revealed that sweeps of US intelligence, including flight software and aircraft plans, had been going on since 2003. The hackers, codenamed Titan Rain by US investigators, were believed to be in Guangdong Province, which has a heavy concentration of PLA and was also identified by Der Spiegel as the origin of the invasion of German networks.
Last November, the US Navy reported a military computer had been attacked, probably by Chinese, though it was unclear whether the hackers were commercial or state-inspired. In July, the US Department of State was reportedly investigating a break-in affecting its work across the world; it was suggested hackers had targeted anything relating to China and North Korea, though it is possible that criminal, as opposed to political or military, hackers were using that as a front to disguise their intentions.
The threat of state-sponsored hacking is dominating the thoughts of security officials worldwide. As 120 countries may be actively pursuing cyber warfare.
China has spelled out in a white paper that what it calls "informationized armed forces" are one of the three pillars of its military strategy, setting itself the target of building a cyber army which could win such a war by 2050.
The extent of cyber warfare was underlined earlier this year when the Guardian revealed that Estonia had been almost overwhelmed by an attack that was believed to have originated inside Russia which rendered several government Web sites useless and was described by Estonian officials as a "very serious disturbance."
The US is particularly vulnerable, both because of the extent of interest in its activities around the world, and because of the sheer size of its systems. The Pentagon operates 3.5 million computers across 65 countries, including 35 internal networks.
Its most sensitive network, Siprnet, is for secret information, and is thought never to have been hacked. Non-classified information passes through the less secure Niprnet; it is one segment of this network the Chinese operation is believed to have pierced.
Though the Pentagon stressed that any e-mails intercepted would be unclassified, that does not inherently rule out disruption.
Sami Saydjari, who worked as a Pentagon cyber expert for 13 years and now runs a private company, Cyber Defence Agency, said: "If someone is able to attack information that is needed by decision makers, or that is crucial to organizing logistics and supply lines of an army on the ground, that means they can induce chaos in a nation."
It is not clear exactly how the hackers gained access to the Pentagon. It may be they deployed the principle of "elevating privilege," said Dan Haagman of the computer forensics company 7Safe.
That would involve breaking into a single, unsecured computer used for mundane administrative tasks, then using its flaws to step across to other computers higher up the chain of command.
The pattern would be similar to that used by the British hacker Gary McKinnon, currently fighting extradition to the US after allegedly breaking into Pentagon and NASA computers.
In the German case, Der Spiegel said a so-called Trojan program implanted in Microsoft Word documents and PowerPoint files had been used to infect systems.
Other ways include viruses, worms and "denial of service" attacks, where a computer system is bombarded with so much information it becomes inoperable.
"We have gone well beyond teenagers who want their egos boosted. We're now into the organized kind of state activity that is truly serious," said Jody Westby at CyLab based at Carnegie Mellon University.
The US strategic commander, General James Cartwright, has said previously that the US military's defense against cyber warfare was disjointed, passive and "dysfunctional."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.