The influence of diet on health has been known since the Ancient Greeks. Our bodies simply cannot synthesize many essential compounds, so our health partly depends on what we eat and drink. Antioxidants, which are believed to help protect us against both cancer and heart disease, are one such element that we must import into our bodies. Studies have shown that there is a significant positive association between a higher intake of fruits and vegetables and reduced risk of chronic disease.
Fruits and vegetables are sources of numerous micronutrients, and some -- including b-carotene (a precursor of vitamin A), vitamin C, vitamin E and selenium -- have potential as antioxidants. But what specifically makes fruits and vegetables so beneficial is not clear.
The main role of antioxidants is to prevent oxidative damage to cellular components, so it has been proposed that dietary antioxidants decrease such damage and with it the risk of disease. This has stimulated interest in the possible preventive potential of antioxidant supplements.
Indeed, consumption of antioxidant supplements in developed countries has become widespread. More than one-third of adults in developed countries now ingest antioxidant pills, which is much easier than eating fruits and vegetables. But will the benefits be the same?
As with any therapeutic intervention, the most convincing and direct proof of the preventive efficacy of antioxidant supplements requires randomized, controlled clinical trials. Such trials eliminate the problems of participants' dietary record and controls the effects of both known and unknown confounding factors. So far, many studies have been conducted to verify the supposed beneficial effects of antioxidant supplements. But, while the results of the epidemiological studies have been almost uniformly positive, the results of clinical trials have remained largely inconclusive.
Some of the clinical trials were terminated prematurely because harmful effects of antioxidant supplements were observed. Indeed, the overwhelming evidence currently calls into question the preventive effect of antioxidant pills. On the contrary, they may be harmful, leading to an increased risk of mortality in people consuming them.
There are several possible explanations for the negative effect of antioxidant supplements. First, the "free radicals" that anti-oxidants act against perform a dual biological function. Free radicals are produced continuously in all cells as part of their normal functioning. In moderate concentrations, they are essential mediators of reactions by which our bodies eliminate unwanted cells.
By eliminating free radicals from our body, we interfere with important defensive mechanisms for eliminating damaged cells, including cancerous cells. In this way, antioxidant substances can also harm people. Whereas our diets typically contain safe levels, highly concentrated antioxidant supplements can be hazardous. In fact, the amount of antioxidants that lends protection is not known and probably differs among individuals. People exposed to increased oxidative stress may have elevated antioxidant requirements.
Moreover, antioxidant supplements in pills are synthetic and biochemically unbalanced compared to their naturally occurring counterparts. They are also not subjected to the same rigorous toxicity studies as other pharmaceutical agents. Indeed, we still lack substantial information on how our bodies metabolize them and how they interact with one another. As a result, it is still unclear whether dosage, duration of use, or parallel intake of other agents will result in differences in their effect.
It also is unclear whether oxidative stress is a primary cause or a secondary phenomenon of chronic diseases, as well as of the aging process. In most human disease, oxidative stress is merely a symptom. So the link between oxidative stress and disease should not be overemphasized.
There are still many gaps in our knowledge of the mechanisms of action of antioxidant supplements. Basic issues concerning the efficacy and safety of consuming relatively high doses of antioxidant supplements need to be resolved. Results of ongoing clinical trials and further studies are required to improve our knowledge.
In the meantime, we know that antioxidants can cause unwanted health consequences. So the optimal source for antioxidants is diet, not supplements. In short, we should stop taking pills and eat more fruits and vegetables.
Goran Bjelakovic is a professor of internal medicine at the University of Nis, Serbia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with