Taiwan's UN referendum
US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte has publicly stated his country's opposition to the Democratic Progressive Party's proposal to hold a referendum on entering the UN under the name "Taiwan."
The people of Taiwan demand that Washington stand up to China and show leadership on this issue.
The US has a long history of sacrificing Taiwanese interests in favor of China and this is why they have labeled the referendum as an attempt to unilaterally alter the "status quo."
The US has a lot to lose from this referendum, since it might require officials to take a stand that would not only upset China, but also expose the US' disregard for the Taiwanese.
The US has always considered Taiwanese to be Chinese because of similarities in race and language.
We, the Taiwanese, want to express our aspiration to join the world community and realize our right to permanent disposition of our territory.
For our sake, this referendum must succeed. This is the first time since World War II that we Taiwanese have been able to express our displeasure with the US for lumping Taiwan together with China in World War II territorial dispositions, and for assuming the Chinese represent the Taiwanese.
We appreciate the efforts of late US secretary of state John Foster Dulles, who kept Taiwan out of the hands of Communist China. But the "two China" policy which still exists, though not in name, continues to deny us Taiwanese a say in our future.
The US has always had the final say on Taiwan and it is responsible for the mess we are in now. The US must meet its responsibilities to the people of Taiwan.
The US began to turn away from its ideals under president Franklin D. Roosevelt. It was Roosevelt who betrayed the ideal of self-determination so eloquently described in the Atlantic Charter and [editor's note: after his death] the UN Charter so that his "Four Policemen" (referring to the four founders of the UN -- the US, UK, former Soviet Union and China) could have a military base in Taiwan.
Roosevelt's miscalculation with regard to the Chinese National Party (KMT) is responsible for all of the current problems in the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwan's UN referendum must continue for the sake of the US, so the Taiwan issue can become an issue in next year's US presidential election.
Central to the discussion should be the wide discretion the US Constitution grants to the president in conducting foreign affairs. If the US Congress had intervened in the long chain of events that led to Taiwan's "limbo" status, most of today's problems could have been avoided. The referendum provides a positive opportunity to encourage debate on this issue.
Alfred Tsai
Berkeley, California
Something exciting is happening in Taiwan. Both President Chen Shui-bian (
There was once an ROC, but this was replaced many years ago by the People's Republic of China (PRC). Everything that belonged to the ROC became the property of the PRC, and all citizens of the ROC automatically became citizens of the PRC.
On Sept. 15, thousands of Taiwanese-Americans will rally at the UN headquarters in support of Chen's bid for Taiwan to be admitted to the UN under her own name. The bid will not succeed because of the veto power held by China. But this is only the first step. The next move will be a petition to the International Court of Justice at the Hague, which will be asked to rule on Taiwan's sovereignty.
From a legal or technical point of view, Taiwan has not been a part of China since 1895. It is up to Taiwanese to decide now whether they want to continue their independence, according to the principles of self-determination upheld by the UN.
The only support Chen needs is an expression of the Taiwanese will -- via referendum -- to be independent. If Chen's referendum succeeds and he is able to alter the Constitution, Taiwan will be able to rejoin the international community under a new flag.
I urge Taiwanese all over the world to support this effort. Do not be afraid that tomorrow will come. When the sun rises again, it will shine on a brand new nation called Taiwan.
Tony Chen
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania
Abandon fossil fuels
Although I've lived and worked in central Taipei for half a year, I only recently got to experience my first scooter ride through the downtown streets.
I distinctly remember at one point being stuck at a red light at an intersection between the tailpipes of a huge bus and a taxi and having no choice but to breathe in the toxic, airborne pollutants the diesel and gasoline vehicles were creating. I'm astounded to think this is an everyday, toxic reality for numerous commuters in Taipei and other cities.
My understanding is that the 11 million gasoline scooters in the country are actually causing most of the pollution in Taiwan's cities. Although fuel-cell scooters are a future solution to petrochemical air pollution, what about the millions of existing scooters?
Ethanol is the logical and "clean" fuel of the future.
Not only is the US Navy making plans to convert to ethanol, but governments worldwide are converting to ethanol and bio-diesel.
In Taiwan's case, ethanol can be produced from locally grown sugarcane or other crops and is also available for import from far more countries than the few that now supply the fossil fuels we run our machines on.
The government's plan to make E3 ethanol gasoline (3 percent ethanol, 97 percent gasoline) available at all filling stations by 2011 is a tiny step forward, but will do little to solve the air pollution problems that affect its people.
Why not a goal of making E30 ethanol gasoline (30 percent ethanol, 70 percent gasoline) available by 2011, or having all scooters convert to bio-fuel in five years?
Air pollution is a worldwide problem and the air in most Asian cities is particularly toxic.
Taiwan should boldly set the example for other countries and improve the health of its citizens by phasing out the use of toxic fossil fuels.
Jeffree Pike
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with