Two countries -- the US and China -- remain unconcerned with global efforts to create a new post-Kyoto framework on climate change. Fifty years ago, the rest of the world might have carried on with remedying the problem of greenhouse gas emissions and let China and the US stew in their own waste. But the world is now so interdependent that what happens in one place affects everywhere else.
For example, visitors and residents alike have long thought of Hong Kong as a beautiful city on the South China coast. But for at least five years Hong Kong's residents have found themselves coughing and wheezing from the city's increasingly degraded air. Corporate employers are even complaining that they are not able to attract overseas talent.
Pollution from Hong Kong's own power generation plants, vehicles and burgeoning shipping industry can certainly be reduced. But the lion's share of this industrial haze -- like the worsening pollution of its coastal waters -- is a direct result of the rapid industrialization of the Pearl River Delta across the border in China's Guangdong Province. China is exporting not only more and more goods, but also its environmental degradation.
The inescapable truth is that the futures of Hong Kong and China are inextricably linked. There are roughly 58,000 factories in the Pearl River Delta with Hong Kong connections, and together they employ more than 10 million workers. Guangdong accounts for approximately 30 percent of China's total foreign trade, while Hong Kong is China's international finance center.
Officials in both Hong Kong and Guangdong seem powerless to clean up environmental problems on their own. In fact, development plans in China may be heading in the opposite direction.
Political heavyweights in Guangdong still favor a form of development that relies on quantity and speed while ignoring overall environmental quality.
And Hong Kong's economic blueprint also focuses heavily on accelerating large infrastructure projects even when their environmental impact has not been rigorously examined. It will not be easy for leaders on either side of the border to reverse gears, but there is still a chance that people and companies can make a difference.
Increasingly loud complaints about deteriorating air quality have goaded Hong Kong and Guangdong into embarking on a joint program in which a series of monitoring stations now provides emissions data. Hong Kong's data has been released regularly, and last year, Guangdong's data was made public for the first time. There is now talk about monitoring water quality. These are laudable steps for China, given its poor record on transparency.
Indeed, the joint air-monitoring network provides a foundation for the region to develop a sophisticated regional air management program. Furthermore, new coal-fired power plants may no longer be allowed on either side of the border, necessitating greater use of natural gas and renewable energy sources.
The first challenge for authorities is to regulate power generation very differently. People are used to paying for the electricity that they actually use. But, to optimize efficiency, utilities need to be rewarded for what they help consumers save. In other words, utilities must be given incentives to help consumers use less power.
This idea is clearly feasible. Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute has proposed what he calls the "negawatt," or energy that is never used. All that is needed are the right financial incentives to induce utility companies to produce less electricity (and still be profitable) and consumers to reduce their use (and gain savings without sacrificing comfort). This can be done by refitting households with high-efficiency light bulbs and other technological improvements, and by retrofitting industrial plants with energy-saving technologies.
Another innovative idea that Hong Kong and Guangdong are exploring is the "P2E2" scheme. To help industries in the region upgrade environmentally, firms can now obtain special loans for which the Asian Development Bank assumes the risk -- a program made possible by Hong Kong's sound banking practices.
Another initiative worth watching is the Hong Kong stock exchange's exploratory project offering a trading platform for emissions derivatives, which will most likely include conventional pollutants as well as carbon. The exchange will undertake a study this summer, with trading to begin as early as next year.
If these reforms are not trumped by efforts to maintain high growth at all costs, the region could not only clean itself up while continuing to prosper, but could also establish a model for all of China. Nothing is more necessary for a country that -- according to the UN Development Program -- has 16 of the world's 20 most polluted cities.
Hong Kong's leaders do not want their city to end up on that infamous list. By saving themselves, they may also play an instrumental role in saving China.
Christine Loh is chief executive officer of Civic Exchange, a public policy think tank based in Hong Kong.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing