The basic commands of "shoot, move, and communicate" apply to a squad of riflemen on the ground, a flotilla of warships at sea and an armada of bombers in the air. Of the three, communicate can often be the most decisive in making for success or failure. Or, as a battle-hardened corps commander in the army once said, in colorful if somewhat inelegant language: "If you ain't got communications, you ain't got nuthin."
In the Pacific and Asia, the armed forces of the US are undergoing perhaps the most extensive changes since World War II. As an essential element of that transition, the Army has begun to strengthen its communications apparatus to enable the US Army of the Pacific to be transformed from an administrative headquarters to an expeditionary, warfighting command. Upgrading Army communications has so far revolved around two transfers.
First, a signal brigade has been transferred to Fort Shafter, Hawaii, from Fort Meade, Maryland, to become a signal command responsible for Army communications in Hawaii, Alaska, Okinawa and other areas of Japan and wherever else in the Asian-Pacific region soldiers might be deployed. The 311 Signal Command is led by Major General Donna Dacier.
Dacier was quoted in a unit publication as saying that when her command is fully operational later this year the Army of the Pacific could take on any mission "and get safe, secure and reliable communications from the foxhole back to the garrison."
Second, a signal battalion has been moved from South Korea to Hawaii to handle the communications of combat units that might be dispatched to the far corners of the region that extends across the Pacific and Indian Oceans to the east coast of Africa. The 307th Signal Battalion is commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Timothy Walrod.
Walrod, whose unit is also expected to be fully operational by the end of this year, was quoted as giving a wry bit of philosophy to his troops about leaving South Korea to become the newest unit in the Army of the Pacific.
"We have no bad habits, no good habits. We have no reputation [so] we must excel," he said.
Moreover, the transfer of this battalion to Hawaii reflects the steady reduction of US forces in South Korea as the South Korean armed forces have become capable of defending their nation from an attack with minimal US help. That reduction has also been motivated by anti-American outbursts suggesting that US forces are no longer welcome in South Korea.
There are other moves in the works. The Air Force is transferring a combat communications squadron from South Korea to Guam, which is being built up as a bastion in the western Pacific.
That communications unit would support bombers and fighters at Anderson Air Force Base if the aircraft were sent into combat.
Likewise, a "Red Horse" engineering unit is being transferred from South Korea to Guam to help construct new facilities to support aerial operations and infrastructure -- meaning roads, water pipelines, sewage lines and electric power plants and grids.
In addition to providing communications, the signal command must maintain the security of its extensive network of message traffic, telecommunications, radio transmissions and video conference calls. A team of about 15 soldiers has mounted a 24-hour watch in an operations security center to detect routine breakdowns and attempts by hackers to get into the network to disrupt it or steal information.
The center is using a multi-layered defense system to protect the network that includes a series of checkpoints, firewalls, scanners, anti-virus programs and encryption devices, all intended to block intrusions. In the skies above, satellites called Ping Sweep and War Dialer monitors attempts to penetrate the network.
China's Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), for instance, has begun to emphasize information warfare. A recent Pentagon report asserted that the PLA had established units "to develop viruses to attack enemy computer systems and networks, and tactics and measures to protect friendly computer systems and networks."
A researcher at the conservative Heritage Foundation, John Tkacik, asserted in a recent essay that PLA units began to attack US government networks in 2003. Several attacks were traced, Tkacik said, to a network in southern China.
Other Chinese "hackers" were reported to have attacked British computer systems, the US State Department, the Department of Commerce and the US Naval War College.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath