A color photograph of the Burmese artist Htein Lin on the day of his release from prison shows him stooped and wan, looking easily 20 years older than his real age. His face is scrawny, and in one his of thin hands he holds a white plastic bag filled with the remnants of more than six years in a cell.
On his face is a jubilant grin.
Behind the smile was a well-kept, high-wire secret.
Htein Lin, a political prisoner accused of planning opposition activities, had managed to smuggle out from prison more than 300 paintings and 1,000 illustrations on paper. Now, three years later, his artworks are offering a rare vision of prison life in Myanmar, one of the world's most authoritarian and closed nations.
The most grisly of Htein Lin's works, titled Six Fingers, shows a line of thin men with missing fingers and toes. These were the men whose families were too poor to provide the US$50 to US$100 bribes that could stop prisoners from being sent to hard labor camps in malarial swamps and stone quarries.
"The only way for the poorer prisoners to escape the camps was to have an `accident,"' said Htein Lin, now 41 and a resident of London.
This usually involved asking another prisoner to use a hoe or a spade from the prison garden to cut off two or three fingers and then show the injuries to the doctors.
Other works, many on the white sarongs that serve as prison uniforms in Myanmar, show gruesome depictions of hunger and sickness. The artworks are on display for the first time at Asia House, a cultural center in central London.
That Htein Lin's work is on public display here pinpoints the long connection between the former Burma and Britain, the colonial power from the 1880s until just after World War II. Htein Lin does not specifically mention George Orwell in his show, but the legacy of Orwell, the British writer who worked as a colonial policeman in Burma and used his experiences there to fashion his themes on the rottenness of Big Brother rule, underlies much of the artist's work.
For Htein Lin, a stint of seven months on death row, where he was sent for punishment for giving a political speech to inmates, turned out to be some of the most productive time.
"It was a good chance to paint because the prison officers didn't come very often, they were too scared," he said.
The death row prisoners, though tough and not the least bit aware of art, wanted to help him.
"They wanted to participate in something. They felt, `Before our death, we can help this artist,"' he said.
So the men on death row willingly gave him their sarongs that were their only form of dress and served as Htein Lin's staple canvas.
The prisoners would then be left naked because sarongs were only issued every six months.
"They would sit there naked but they were very difficult to punish," Htein Lin said.
So the prison guards would give in and issue new sarongs, ensuring a future supply for the clandestine artist.
Htein Lin ended up in prison after a colleague in an opposition group, unbeknownst to the artist, sent a letter in 1998 to another colleague mentioning him as a possible recruit. The secret police intercepted the letter. They came to his house in Yangon and hauled him off blindfolded. A military tribunal sentenced him to seven years in prison. He was released slightly early as a part of a general amnesty in 2004.
The artist had been a supporter of Aung San Suu Kyi, the pro-democracy leader who has been under house arrest for much of the last 17 years, since 1988. The US demands the release of Aung San Suu Kyi as a condition for dropping severe economic sanctions.
"The main problem when I was arrested was that I answered their questions," he said. "I said, Aung San Suu Kyi loves the country like you."
Once in jail, life became a perpetual game of finding materials and befriending prison guards who would safely deliver his works to friends outside.
He became close to a medical orderly, who was a poet and happy to supply him with the syringes that became his substitute paint brushes.
With the little bit of money that his family brought him on visits, he bribed friendly prison guards to bring him oil paint. Sometimes they would buy him acrylic paint, sometimes house paint.
One of his more ingenious methods was to use the plasticized white back of a photo of Buddha he was allowed to keep in his cell as a print plate. He would draw on the white coated surface and then put a cloth on top to transfer the image.
Sometimes, there were near scrapes. After a prisoner tattled on Htein Lin, guards came marching into his cell hunting for his art.
He had a painting on a sarong drying on his cell wall, he said, and held his breath as the guards lifted a corner of the sarong to peer behind, and then put it back in place. They had no idea the wet cloth was what they were looking for.
A fellow artist, Chaw Ei Thein, 38, is visiting for the three months of his show from her art studio in Yangon. She has created performance art in Japan and Taiwan, and her paintings have been shown in Thailand.
The two met in law school in Yangon in the 1990s, dropped plans to be lawyers and together created performance art that pushed the junta's limits on freedom of expression. Several years ago, they devised a performance in which they went into one of Yangon's busy outdoor markets, and sold small items -- candy, ribbons -- for tiny amounts of money. The performance was, of course, a commentary on the inflated prices under the current government.
Unexpectedly, they were arrested. But other more serious offenders suspected of planting bombs in the capital were being held at the same police station.
The police confessed, Chaw Ei Thein said, that they could not cope with two cases at once.
So the police told Htein Lin and Chaw Ei Thein to go free, but not before asking the two artists, in one of the Orwellian gestures that seem to permeate Burmese life, to help draw sketches of the bomb suspects.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers