Because the changing climate has contributed to the growing frequency of natural disasters all over the world, governments and media in most countries have started paying closer attention to global warming, which will be the biggest challenge for mankind this century.
Yet when faced with this problem, Taiwan -- from the nation's leaders down to the grassroots level -- consistently shows a lack of interest.
Research shows that carbon dioxide emissions here have grown at least 134 percent over the past 50 years, compared to a worldwide increase of 16 percent.
Average emissions here now exceed 12 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year per person, or three times the world average. At a time of global calls for a reduction in emissions, this increase is quite shocking.
The reason the nation doesn't care about the increase in carbon dioxide emissions goes back to its exclusion from the UN.
As it is not a UN member, Taiwan is not subject to UN restrictions and is under no obligation to reduce its emissions levels.
As the nation is unable to participate as a member in UN activities, most Taiwanese usually do not concern ourselves with international affairs and it becomes commonplace to think that these matters are not applicable here.
Another reason for the attitude toward climate change is that because the nation has been excluded from international organizations, Taiwanese have become suspicious of these world bodies.
But even though the nation cannot officially participate as a member of the international community -- and also for the sake of our children and grandchildren -- Taiwan should not ignore climate change.
Of course, helping to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and being an ethical and environmentally conscious person is not as easy as it may seem.
Although it is true that some small actions can help the environment, such actions only have a very limited influence on decreasing carbon dioxide emission levels.
If we don't consider changes in lifestyle or actively use alternative non-carbon based energy sources, any attempt to reach the goal of decreasing emissions by 20 percent per person will be doomed to failure.
On the other hand, if the international community is serious about attaining the ultimate goal of controlling global warming, it must stop acting as if Taiwan, now a major source of emissions, does not exist.
Instead, a space should be created to give all countries that feel the impact of international policies -- Taiwan included -- the opportunity to effectively participate in international policy making.
The nation should be allowed to participate with and communicate with international organizations in order to combat climate change. That is the only way we will be able to find a solution to the problem of global warming.
Morgan Huang is a doctoral candidate at the School of Social and Political Studies of the University of Edinburgh.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS