Having recently completed my 21st year of teaching in colleges and universities in Taiwan, I would like to offer my NT$2 worth to the ongoing discussion and debate concerning English education.
Stephen Krashen asserted that "there is no evidence that English standards are declining and no evidence that students in Taiwan are significantly worse in English than students in other Asian countries," (Letters, July 30, page 8).
In the same letter Krashen cited TOEFL results for several Asian countries to demonstrate that "Taiwan's scores are not remarkably different from those of the other countries."
My observations through the years have led me to believe that the standard from which scores are "not declining" is nothing to be proud of. Thus, I disagree with Jim Walsh, who evidently began teaching in Taiwan only one year after I did (Letters, April 2, page 8).
Walsh remarked that he has "seen amazing changes in the nation, including substantial improvement in the quality of English. It is nonsense to call the English here pathetic."
Can Walsh or anyone else provide empirical evidence that there has been "substantial improvement in the quality of English" in Taiwan in the past two decades?
In my office there are numerous stacks of academic reports written by graduate students, most of whose writing is, indeed, pathetic.
At the university where I teach and edit research reports for the faculty, I taught a course titled "English Technical Writing for Graduate Students in the School of Engineering" for nine consecutive semesters, during which I observed steadily declining proficiency levels.
More recently -- at the same university -- I taught a course titled Academic Writing to graduate students in the Department of English for four consecutive semesters, during which I observed that most of those students do not write any better than the engineering students.
Yet several of those graduate English majors are already teachers of English in the public schools or in cram schools, actively participating in the vicious cycle of sub-standard proficiency.
In my office library and files there are more than a few examples of academic and journalistic writing by Taiwanese teachers of English at the tertiary level. Most of those books, major academic papers, scholarly journal articles, and memoranda contain rather frequent errors in grammar, syntax and diction.
It is not my intention to make attacks on any individual; rather, I merely wish to call attention to the "inconvenient" truth that an overwhelming majority of Taiwanese students have poor proficiency in English primarily because there are too many Taiwanese teachers of English -- even at the tertiary level -- whose proficiency is inadequate.
The greatest teacher that the world has ever seen said: "Can a blind man lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit? A student is not above his teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like his teacher" (Luke 6:39-40).
Datsuen, Changhua County
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more