The drubbing Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Liberal Democratic Party received in last Sunday's election in Japan was not only a setback for them, but also meant that an opportunity for leadership in Asia has faded.
A chance to overcome the "demons of history" left from World War II has slipped away. The time to revise Japan's pacifist Constitution has been delayed and Japan's negotiating position has been weakened in talks intended to foil North Korea's nuclear ambitions.
In Tokyo, the prime minister has been severely censured by his voters and now confronts a legislature in which his party controls the lower House of Representatives, while the opposition Democratic Party of Japan controls the upper House of Councilors -- a divided government, it might be said, not unlike that in Washington.
A leading newspaper, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, referring to Abe and US President George W. Bush, said in a midweek editorial: "Having lost their political momentum, both the Abe and Bush administrations are finding it increasingly difficult to resolve problems."
Abe, having taken office last September with a head of steam inherited from his remarkably successful predecessor Junichiro Koizumi, has experienced repeated breakdowns that led voters to administer a resounding defeat. Three Cabinet ministers resigned before the election over allegations of corruption or controversial statements; a fourth, agriculture minister Norihiko Akagi, resigned this week.
Koizumi had begun to nudge Japan out of the cocoon in which the Japanese had wrapped themselves after World War II. Former deputy minister of foreign affairs Hitoshi Tanaka articulated the aspirations of many Japanese in a paper written before but published after the election, asserting that Japan had the capacity to exert influence far beyond its shores.
To do so, Tanaka argued, "Japan must not only clarify its long-term vision for the region but also develop a clear policy through which to achieve its goals." With a split government and electorate behind him, Abe will find that difficult.
Moreover, the "demons of history" will continue to haunt Abe and Japan, as the politically disrupted nation will be able to do little to conquer them. The US House of Representatives, for instance, passed a non-binding resolution this week calling on Japan to apologize for recruiting hundreds of women into prostitution to serve as "comfort women" for soldiers during World War II.
The voice vote, meaning no record was made, was taken despite opposition from Senator Daniel Inouyei, who said that six Japanese prime ministers had apologized since 1994. The senator, a Japanese American who rarely comments on Japan, questioned the propriety of the US condemning another nation when the US was not involved.
"How would the US government have reacted if the legislature of some other nation had condemned our historical actions in World War II?" the senator asked, referring to the incarceration of 120,000 Japanese Americans during that war.
He warned, as did prominent Japanese, that the resolution would harm US relations with Japan.
Abe will have difficulty in pushing through a revision of Article IX of the Constitution that constrains Japan's armed forces and legislation that would permit them to operate in collective defense with other nations, notably the US. The US has been quietly urging those changes.
Senior US military officers said, however, that they expected the realignment of US forces in Japan, such as consolidating bases and locating Japanese headquarters alongside US headquarters, to continue.
Said one officer: "The US and Japan signed government-to-government agreements, which make this a done deal, so to speak."
The officers said that North Korea, which is building missiles and nuclear weapons, and China, which has been rapidly expanding its forces, are still perceived to threaten Japan's security.
Referring to North Korea, an officer said: "The continuing sense of Japan's vulnerability in light of last year's nuke test and missile launches will likely keep the initiatives going."
The debate within Japan about acquiring nuclear weapons that has been generated by the perceived threats from North Korea and China will most likely continue. With a divided government, however, those who might advocate that their nation acquire nuclear arms would come up against even more obstacles than exist now in nuclear-allergic Japan.
As ever, the key to a nuclear Japan is held in Washington, not Tokyo. So long has the Japanese believe the US will keep its commitments to defend Japan with nuclear weapons, if necessary, they will refrain from acquiring their own.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military