The drubbing Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Liberal Democratic Party received in last Sunday's election in Japan was not only a setback for them, but also meant that an opportunity for leadership in Asia has faded.
A chance to overcome the "demons of history" left from World War II has slipped away. The time to revise Japan's pacifist Constitution has been delayed and Japan's negotiating position has been weakened in talks intended to foil North Korea's nuclear ambitions.
In Tokyo, the prime minister has been severely censured by his voters and now confronts a legislature in which his party controls the lower House of Representatives, while the opposition Democratic Party of Japan controls the upper House of Councilors -- a divided government, it might be said, not unlike that in Washington.
A leading newspaper, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, referring to Abe and US President George W. Bush, said in a midweek editorial: "Having lost their political momentum, both the Abe and Bush administrations are finding it increasingly difficult to resolve problems."
Abe, having taken office last September with a head of steam inherited from his remarkably successful predecessor Junichiro Koizumi, has experienced repeated breakdowns that led voters to administer a resounding defeat. Three Cabinet ministers resigned before the election over allegations of corruption or controversial statements; a fourth, agriculture minister Norihiko Akagi, resigned this week.
Koizumi had begun to nudge Japan out of the cocoon in which the Japanese had wrapped themselves after World War II. Former deputy minister of foreign affairs Hitoshi Tanaka articulated the aspirations of many Japanese in a paper written before but published after the election, asserting that Japan had the capacity to exert influence far beyond its shores.
To do so, Tanaka argued, "Japan must not only clarify its long-term vision for the region but also develop a clear policy through which to achieve its goals." With a split government and electorate behind him, Abe will find that difficult.
Moreover, the "demons of history" will continue to haunt Abe and Japan, as the politically disrupted nation will be able to do little to conquer them. The US House of Representatives, for instance, passed a non-binding resolution this week calling on Japan to apologize for recruiting hundreds of women into prostitution to serve as "comfort women" for soldiers during World War II.
The voice vote, meaning no record was made, was taken despite opposition from Senator Daniel Inouyei, who said that six Japanese prime ministers had apologized since 1994. The senator, a Japanese American who rarely comments on Japan, questioned the propriety of the US condemning another nation when the US was not involved.
"How would the US government have reacted if the legislature of some other nation had condemned our historical actions in World War II?" the senator asked, referring to the incarceration of 120,000 Japanese Americans during that war.
He warned, as did prominent Japanese, that the resolution would harm US relations with Japan.
Abe will have difficulty in pushing through a revision of Article IX of the Constitution that constrains Japan's armed forces and legislation that would permit them to operate in collective defense with other nations, notably the US. The US has been quietly urging those changes.
Senior US military officers said, however, that they expected the realignment of US forces in Japan, such as consolidating bases and locating Japanese headquarters alongside US headquarters, to continue.
Said one officer: "The US and Japan signed government-to-government agreements, which make this a done deal, so to speak."
The officers said that North Korea, which is building missiles and nuclear weapons, and China, which has been rapidly expanding its forces, are still perceived to threaten Japan's security.
Referring to North Korea, an officer said: "The continuing sense of Japan's vulnerability in light of last year's nuke test and missile launches will likely keep the initiatives going."
The debate within Japan about acquiring nuclear weapons that has been generated by the perceived threats from North Korea and China will most likely continue. With a divided government, however, those who might advocate that their nation acquire nuclear arms would come up against even more obstacles than exist now in nuclear-allergic Japan.
As ever, the key to a nuclear Japan is held in Washington, not Tokyo. So long has the Japanese believe the US will keep its commitments to defend Japan with nuclear weapons, if necessary, they will refrain from acquiring their own.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers