The drubbing Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Liberal Democratic Party received in last Sunday's election in Japan was not only a setback for them, but also meant that an opportunity for leadership in Asia has faded.
A chance to overcome the "demons of history" left from World War II has slipped away. The time to revise Japan's pacifist Constitution has been delayed and Japan's negotiating position has been weakened in talks intended to foil North Korea's nuclear ambitions.
In Tokyo, the prime minister has been severely censured by his voters and now confronts a legislature in which his party controls the lower House of Representatives, while the opposition Democratic Party of Japan controls the upper House of Councilors -- a divided government, it might be said, not unlike that in Washington.
A leading newspaper, the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, referring to Abe and US President George W. Bush, said in a midweek editorial: "Having lost their political momentum, both the Abe and Bush administrations are finding it increasingly difficult to resolve problems."
Abe, having taken office last September with a head of steam inherited from his remarkably successful predecessor Junichiro Koizumi, has experienced repeated breakdowns that led voters to administer a resounding defeat. Three Cabinet ministers resigned before the election over allegations of corruption or controversial statements; a fourth, agriculture minister Norihiko Akagi, resigned this week.
Koizumi had begun to nudge Japan out of the cocoon in which the Japanese had wrapped themselves after World War II. Former deputy minister of foreign affairs Hitoshi Tanaka articulated the aspirations of many Japanese in a paper written before but published after the election, asserting that Japan had the capacity to exert influence far beyond its shores.
To do so, Tanaka argued, "Japan must not only clarify its long-term vision for the region but also develop a clear policy through which to achieve its goals." With a split government and electorate behind him, Abe will find that difficult.
Moreover, the "demons of history" will continue to haunt Abe and Japan, as the politically disrupted nation will be able to do little to conquer them. The US House of Representatives, for instance, passed a non-binding resolution this week calling on Japan to apologize for recruiting hundreds of women into prostitution to serve as "comfort women" for soldiers during World War II.
The voice vote, meaning no record was made, was taken despite opposition from Senator Daniel Inouyei, who said that six Japanese prime ministers had apologized since 1994. The senator, a Japanese American who rarely comments on Japan, questioned the propriety of the US condemning another nation when the US was not involved.
"How would the US government have reacted if the legislature of some other nation had condemned our historical actions in World War II?" the senator asked, referring to the incarceration of 120,000 Japanese Americans during that war.
He warned, as did prominent Japanese, that the resolution would harm US relations with Japan.
Abe will have difficulty in pushing through a revision of Article IX of the Constitution that constrains Japan's armed forces and legislation that would permit them to operate in collective defense with other nations, notably the US. The US has been quietly urging those changes.
Senior US military officers said, however, that they expected the realignment of US forces in Japan, such as consolidating bases and locating Japanese headquarters alongside US headquarters, to continue.
Said one officer: "The US and Japan signed government-to-government agreements, which make this a done deal, so to speak."
The officers said that North Korea, which is building missiles and nuclear weapons, and China, which has been rapidly expanding its forces, are still perceived to threaten Japan's security.
Referring to North Korea, an officer said: "The continuing sense of Japan's vulnerability in light of last year's nuke test and missile launches will likely keep the initiatives going."
The debate within Japan about acquiring nuclear weapons that has been generated by the perceived threats from North Korea and China will most likely continue. With a divided government, however, those who might advocate that their nation acquire nuclear arms would come up against even more obstacles than exist now in nuclear-allergic Japan.
As ever, the key to a nuclear Japan is held in Washington, not Tokyo. So long has the Japanese believe the US will keep its commitments to defend Japan with nuclear weapons, if necessary, they will refrain from acquiring their own.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US