A historic opposition election victory has raised chances of a new era in Japanese politics, with the conservative ruling party finally seeing a real challenge after half a century in power, analysts said on Monday.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost nearly half of the seats it was defending in Sunday's upper house polls, tumbling from the largest party in a chamber for the first time since it was founded in 1955.
The main opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) is set to control a chamber of parliament for the first time -- although some cautioned that the election was more a ruling-party defeat than an opposition victory.
"Japanese politics are now facing a crucial turning point," said Hidekazu Kawai, honorary professor of politics at Gakushuin University in Tokyo.
"It's not the first time to see a sign of a change in Japanese politics, but this appears to be the beginning of the end to the 1955 regime," Kawai said.
If the DPJ proves it can govern, "Japan will take a step closer to being a country with a sound political system, like other developed countries."
The LDP has been in power in the world's second largest economy for all but 10 months since it was formed, thriving on support from businesses, rural voters and the bureaucracy.
It can remain in power even now, as it still enjoys a wide majority in the more powerful lower house won under Abe's popular predecessor Junichiro Koizumi -- who styled himself as a reformist out against the LDP's vested interests.
The DPJ, led by the famously shrewd former LDP strongman Ichiro Ozawa, won over voters in traditional LDP strongholds by tapping into anger against Koizumi's free-market reforms, including the scaling back of public services.
But analysts warned that the DPJ, formed in 1998 between LDP dissidents and former socialists, risked unravelling under the weight of its contradictions.
"This was not an election in which people voted to have the DPJ take over the government. They voted against Prime Minister Abe," said Gerald Curtis, a Japan expert at New York's Columbia University.
"The DPJ is not ready to take over power. They should hope that Abe holds on for as long as possible while they try to get their act together."
Abe refused to step down, saying the election mauling was due to scandals such as mismanagement of the pension system and not a rejection of his conservative ideas.
The DPJ itself is divided on Abe's agenda. Ozawa is a longtime advocate of Abe's signature issue -- rewriting the US-imposed post-World War II pacifist Constitution.
"It is too early to say if a two-party system can become rooted in Japan," said Tetsuro Kato, professor of politics at Hitotsubashi University in Tokyo. "The next stage is general elections, and the question is if the DPJ can maintain this momentum until then."
The LDP-led coalition can use its sweeping majority in the lower house to override votes in the upper house, setting the stage for policy deadlock.
Fresh from victory, the upbeat opposition camp urged Abe to dissolve the lower house -- which could bring a change in power.
But analysts warned the DPJ should be careful what it wished for.
"To take power, the DPJ needs to coordinate its basic policy principles," said Shujiro Kato, professor of politics in Toyo University.
"The DPJ gives the impression that it's a hodgepodge of different factions. The closer the DPJ comes to power, the more annoying this will get for voters," he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under