Last week, the New York Times published a series of reports asking why, after half a century of effort and with US surveys indicating strong support for solar energy, the alternative power source still only accounts for 0.01 percent of energy produced in the US. Moreover, use of solar power is expected to rise by only between 2 percent and 3 percent in the next half-century, the US Department of Energy estimates.
The newspaper concluded that solar energy research and development had always lacked necessary government support.
Government funding of research has favored cutting-edge science and high-profile technology. For years, international energy research budgets have mostly been spent on nuclear energy technology. The EU, the US, China, Japan, South Korea, Russia and India are planning to spend NT$330 billion (US$9.128 billion) to build an experimental nuclear fusion reactor in France, even though that technology is still 40 or 50 years away from producing power.
Ever since countries began working to reduce emissions, governments have focused investment on development and production of biomass energy. Under pressure from farmers and the US Congress, Washington has put most additional funding into bioethanol and biodiesel. Although the use of biofuel remains under 2 percent of energy consumption, it has already had a serious impact on global food production and prices.
Researchers are concerned that other renewable energy sources, such as wind, geothermal energy and ocean wave energy, require too much space to become mainstream. Research has shown that carbohydrate fuel stored in sea ice can be harvested, but this is of little use in reducing emissions because using it releases carbon dioxide. Moreover, usable carbon dioxide recycling and storage technology is still at least 20 to 30 years away.
The public and researchers support the use of solar energy. In the past, the government mistakenly assumed that solar power technology had already matured, and that improving the efficiency and lowering prices should be the industry's responsibility. Therefore, it didn't support research and development, and producers didn't want to risk building factories. The situation has improved recently, however.
The efficiency of thin-film solar cells is still only about 20 percent. Using nanotechnology, efficiency can be boosted significantly. With reflectors focusing the light, technology to produce electricity from solar heat will soon be ready to be put to use.
Germany and Japan are the countries most actively promoting solar energy. In addition to improving its energy policy, the German government has invested NT$55 billion in solar energy research and development over the past two decades. The industry employs 43,000 people, with an annual output value of NT$230 billion, or about 50 percent of the global total. Within 15 years, it will employ 200,000 people and its annual production value will surpass NT$1 trillion.
Of course, the availability of sunlight as a source varies according to climate, geographical environment, season and everyday weather. Whether or not the sun can become a mainstream source of energy will depend on breakthroughs in technology for storing and transferring energy. As such, US President George W. Bush and Congress have drawn up a plan to boost the budget for solar technology research and development.
In Taiwan, a number of companies are involved in solar cell production. As businesses worldwide try to seize another opportunity to make money, the future of solar power here hinges on the government producing a solid, comprehensive energy policy.
Tsong Tien-tzou is a research fellow at the Academia Sinica's Institute of Physics. Translated by Marc Langer
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS